ArticleScientific reports2022
A new method of intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring: a preclinical feasibility study in a porcine model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting the Concept of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Proof-of-Concept Prospective Study From a Cervical Cancer Cohort.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on bioimpedance signals: a new method analyzed on 30 patients.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Improved early continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the urethral hammock technique.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Automatic muscle impedance and nerve analyzer (AMINA) as a novel approach for classifying bioimpedance signals in intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Technical aspects of a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring during robotic rectal surgery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low anterior resections (LAR) are frequently associated with complications such as urinary and fecal incontinence as well as sexual disorders. Typical risk factors are rectal cancer with low tumor location, preoperative radiotherapy, and surgery-related damage of pelvic autonomic nerves. As preserving the pelvic autonomic nerves without any technical assistance is challenging, the objective of this preclinical study was to investigate the technical feasibility of a new method for intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring. Twelve female pigs undergoing low anterior resections were involved in a prospective preclinical study. Intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring included direct pelvic nerve stimulation and tissue impedance measurement on the urinary bladder and the rectum for the identification of efferent pelvic nerves in the surgical area. Immunohistochemistry was used to verify the results. Smooth muscle contraction of the urinary bladder and/or the rectum in response to direct stimulation of the innervating nerves was detectable with impedance measurement. The macroscopic contraction of both the urinary bladder and the rectum correlated with a change in tissue impedance compared to the status before contraction. Thus, it was possible to identify pelvic nerves in the surgical area, which allows the nerves to be preserved. The results indicate a reliable identification of pelvic autonomic nerves, which allows nerve damage to be prevented in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.