Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35256629›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Seasonal variation in space use and territoriality in a large mammal (Sus scrofa).

Peter E Schlichting, Raoul K Boughton, Wes Anderson, Bethany Wight, Kurt C VerCauteren, Ryan S Miller, Jesse S Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter E SchlichtingCollege of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus, 6073 South Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ, 85212, USA. pschlichting@gmail.com.
Raoul K BoughtonUniversity of Florida, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL, 33865, USA.
Wes AndersonUniversity of Florida, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL, 33865, USA.
Bethany WightUniversity of Florida, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL, 33865, USA.
Kurt C VerCauterenUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO, 80521-2154, USA.
Ryan S MillerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, 2150B Center Avenue, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA.
Jesse S LewisCollege of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus, 6073 South Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ, 85212, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's spatial behavior is shaped by social and environmental factors and provides critical information about population processes to inform conservation and management actions. Heterogeneity in spatial overlap among conspecifics can be evaluated using estimates of home ranges and core areas and used to understand factors influencing space use and territoriality. To understand and test predictions about spatial behavior in an invasive large mammal, the wild pig (Sus scrofa), we examined variation in space use between sexes and seasons. We predicted that if animals were territorial that there would be a reduction in space-use overlap when comparing overlap of home ranges (HR-HR), to home ranges and core areas (HR-CA), and in-turn between core areas (CA-CA). Home ranges and core areas were estimated for 54 wild pigs at Buck Island Ranch, FL from GPS telemetry data. Overlap indices were calculated to estimate the strength (space-use overlap) and number of potential interactions within three wet seasons (June-October) and two dry seasons (December-April). Among sexes, home range size did not vary seasonally, and males exhibited larger home ranges compared to females (M = 10.36 ± 0.79 km

Indexed as

Homing BehaviorTerritorialityAnimalsFemaleMaleSeasonsSpatial BehaviorSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID35256629
PMCPMC8901613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.