Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255970›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2022

The Public Health 12 framework: interpreting the 'Meadows 12 places to act in a system' for use in public health.

Kristy A Bolton, Jillian Whelan, Penny Fraser, Colin Bell, Steven Allender, Andrew D Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and testing of the capacity of organisations for system practices scale.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. 'It's about collaboration': a whole-systems approach to understanding and promoting movement in Suffolk.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristy A Bolton *Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Jillian Whelan *Institute of Health Transformation, School of Medicine, Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. jill.whelan@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-109X
Penny FraserInstitute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Colin BellInstitute of Health Transformation, School of Medicine, Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Steven AllenderInstitute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Andrew D BrownInstitute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1114118National Health and Medical Research Council GNT 1151572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems science approaches have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying underlying drivers of complex problems and facilitating the emergence of potential interventions that are locally tailored, feasible, sustainable and evidence informed. Despite the potential usefulness of system dynamics simulation modelling and other systems science modelling techniques in guiding implementation, time and cost constraints have limited its ability to provide strong guidance on how to implement complex interventions in communities. Guidance is required to ensure systems interventions lead to impactful systems solutions, implemented utilising strategies from the intersecting fields of systems science and implementation science. To provide cost-effective guidance on how and where to implement in systems, we offer a translation of the 'Meadows 12 places to act in a system' (Meadows 12) into language useful for public health.

methodsThis translation of Meadows 12 was informed by our experience in working with 31 communities across two complex large scale randomised control trials and one large whole of community case study. These research projects utilised systems science and implementation science to co-create childhood obesity prevention interventions. The team undertaking this translation comprised research academics, implementation specialists and practitioners, practice-based researchers and a systems dynamicist. Our translation of each of the Meadows 12 levels to act in the system maintains the fidelity and nuance of the 12 distinct levels. We provide examples of each level of the Public Health 12 framework (PH12) drawn from 31 communities. All research was conducted in Victoria, Australia between 2016 and 2020.

resultsPH12 provides a framework to guide both research and practice in real world contexts to implement targeted system level interventions. PH12 can be used with existing implementation science theory to identify relevant strategies for implementation of these interventions to impact the system at each of the leverage points.

conclusionTo date little guidance for public health practitioners and researchers exists regarding how to implement systems change in community-led public health interventions. PH12 enables operationalisation Meadows 12 systems theory into public health interventions. PH12 can help research and practice determine where leverage can be applied in the system to optimise public health systems level interventions and identify gaps in existing efforts.

trial registrationWHO STOPS: ANZCTR: 12616000980437 . RESPOND: ANZCTR: 12618001986268p .

Indexed as

ImplementationLeverage pointsPublic healthSystems scienceSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID35255970
PMCPMC8900091
OpenAlexW4220967321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.