Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255968›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2022

Angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios and MMP-3 levels as an early warning sign for the presence of giant cell arteritis in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

Yannick van Sleen, Philip Therkildsen, Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen, Kornelis S M van der Geest, Ib Hansen, Peter Heeringa, Marcel D Posthumus, Maria Sandovici, Erik J M Toonen, Jannik Zijlstra and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yannick van Sleen *Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands. y.van.sleen@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7382-8322
Philip Therkildsen *Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Berit Dalsgaard NielsenDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Kornelis S M van der GeestDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands.
Ib HansenDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Peter HeeringaDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marcel D PosthumusDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Maria SandoviciDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands.
Erik J M ToonenR&D Department, Hycult Biotechnology, Uden, the Netherlands.
Jannik ZijlstraDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands.
Annemieke M H BootsDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands.
Ellen-Margrethe HaugeDepartment of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Elisabeth BrouwerDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosing patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains difficult. Due to its non-specific symptoms, it is challenging to identify GCA in patients presenting with symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), which is a more common disease. Also, commonly used acute-phase markers CRP and ESR fail to discriminate GCA patients from PMR and (infectious) mimicry patients. Therefore, we investigated biomarkers reflecting vessel wall inflammation for their utility in the accurate diagnosis of GCA in two international cohorts.

methodsTreatment-naïve GCA patients participated in the Aarhus AGP cohort (N = 52) and the Groningen GPS cohort (N = 48). The AGP and GPS biomarker levels and symptoms were compared to patients presenting phenotypically as isolated PMR, infectious mimicry controls and healthy controls (HCs). Serum/plasma levels of 12 biomarkers were measured by ELISA or Luminex.

resultsIn both the AGP and the GPS cohort, we found that weight loss, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and higher angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios but lower matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 levels identify concomitant GCA in PMR patients. In addition, we confirmed that elevated platelet counts are characteristic of GCA but not of GCA mimicry controls and that low MMP-3 and proteinase 3 (PR3) levels may help to discriminate GCA from infections.

conclusionThis study, performed in two independent international cohorts, consistently shows the potential of angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios and MMP-3 levels to identify GCA in patients presenting with PMR. These biomarkers may be used to select which PMR patients require further diagnostic workup. Platelet counts may be used to discriminate GCA from GCA look-alike patients.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisMatrix Metalloproteinase 3Polymyalgia RheumaticaAngiopoietin-1Angiopoietin-2BiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansAngiopoietin-1Angiopoietin-2BiomarkersMatrix Metalloproteinase 3Angiopoietin-2Giant cell arteritisLook-alike patientsMMP-3PlateletsPolymyalgia rheumatica

Identifiers

PMID35255968
PMCPMC8900446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.