Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255965›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2022

Six-month outcomes of the HOPE smartphone application designed to support treatment with medications for opioid use disorder and piloted during an early statewide COVID-19 lockdown.

Jacqueline Hodges, Marika Waselewski, William Harrington, Taylor Franklin, Kelly Schorling, Jacqueline Huynh, Alexa Tabackman, Kori Otero, Karen Ingersoll, Nassima Ait-Daoud Tiouririne and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline HodgesDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, PO Box 801340, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-1340, USA. jchodges03@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9879-7502
Marika WaselewskiUniversity of Michigan Medical School, 7300 Medical Science Building I - A Wing, 1301 Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5624, USA.
William HarringtonUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Taylor FranklinUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Kelly SchorlingDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, 1300 Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Jacqueline HuynhUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Alexa TabackmanUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Kori OteroDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, PO Box 801340, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-1340, USA.
Karen IngersollDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, 1300 Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Nassima Ait-Daoud TiouririneDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, 1300 Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Tabor FlickingerDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Rebecca DillinghamDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, PO Box 801340, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-1340, USA.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASES TRAINING PROGRAMT32AI007046 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Alison K Criss, William A Petri · 1985 to 2026
$15.3M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007046NIH HHS T32AI007046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorbidity and mortality related to opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S. is at an all-time high. Innovative approaches are needed to address gaps in retention in treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Mobile health (mHealth) approaches have shown improvement in engagement in care and associated clinical outcomes for a variety of chronic diseases, but mHealth tools designed specifically to support patients treated with MOUD are limited.

methodsFollowing user-centered development and testing phases, a multi-feature smartphone application called HOPE (Heal. Overcome. Persist. Endure) was piloted in a small cohort of patients receiving MOUD and at high risk of disengagement in care at an office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) clinic in Central Virginia. Outcomes were tracked over a six-month period following patient enrollment. They included retention in care at the OBOT clinic, usage of various features of the application, and self-rated measures of mental health, substance use, treatment and recovery.

resultsOf the 25 participants in the HOPE pilot study, a majority were retained in care at 6 months (56%). Uptake of bi-directional features including messaging with providers and daily check-ins of mood, stress and medication adherence peaked at one month, and usage persisted through the sixth month. Patients who reported that distance to clinic was a problem at baseline had higher loss to follow up compared to those without distance as a reported barrier (67% vs 23%, p = 0.03). Patients lost to in-person clinic follow up continued to engage with one or more app features, indicating that mHealth approaches may bridge barriers to clinic visit attendance. Participants surveyed at baseline and 6 months (N = 16) scored higher on scales related to overall self-control and self-efficacy related to drug abstinence.

conclusionsA pilot study of a novel multi-feature smartphone application to support OUD treatment showed acceptable retention in care and patient usage at 6 months. Further study within a larger population is needed to characterize 'real world' uptake and association with outcomes related to retention in care, relapse prevention, and opioid-associated mortality.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCOVID-19Mobile ApplicationsOpioid-Related DisordersCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2SmartphoneBuprenorphineDigital healthMedications for opioid use disorderMobile healthOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID35255965
PMCPMC8899792
OpenAlexW4220913435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.