Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022
Limitations of the ARDS criteria during high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation: evidence from critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Old and New Definitions of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): An Overview of Practical Considerations and Clinical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predictive modeling of ARDS mortality integrating biomarker/cytokine, clinical and metabolomic data.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Nutrition in the intensive care unit and early recovery influence functional outcomes for survivors of critical illness: A prospective cohort study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2023Article
- Broadening the Berlin definition of ARDS to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen: an observational study in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology of Hypoxemia in COVID-19 Lung Disease.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023Review
- Light-Based Therapy: Novel Approach to Treat COVID-19.Tanaffos · 2023Review
- Incidence and clinical outcomes of bacterial superinfections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Usefulness and limitations of the acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in non-intubated patients. A narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Case Report: The Experience of Managing a Moderate ARDS Caused by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 Variant in Chongqing, China: Can We Do Better?Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO
methodsWe investigated respiratory function in critically ill patients with COVID-19 included in a single-center prospective observational study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden. In a steady state condition, the PaO
resultsA total of 148 patients were included in the present analysis. We find that any change in respiratory support from or to HFNC caused a significant change in PaO
conclusionsHFNC is associated with lower PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.