Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255922›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Reconstructing asynchrony for mechanical ventilation using a hysteresis loop virtual patient model.

Cong Zhou, J Geoffrey Chase, Qianhui Sun, Jennifer Knopp, Merryn H Tawhai, Thomas Desaive, Knut Möller, Geoffrey M Shaw, Yeong Shiong Chiew, Balazs Benyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cong ZhouSchool of Civil Aviation & Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xian, China. cong.zhou@nwpu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-1613
J Geoffrey ChaseDept of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Qianhui SunDept of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jennifer KnoppDept of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Merryn H TawhaiAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Thomas DesaiveGIGA-In Silico Medicine, Institute of Physics, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Knut MöllerInstitute for Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Geoffrey M ShawDept of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Yeong Shiong ChiewSchool of Engineering, Monash University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Balazs BenyoDept of Control Engineering and Information Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-specific lung mechanics during mechanical ventilation (MV) can be identified from measured waveforms of fully ventilated, sedated patients. However, asynchrony due to spontaneous breathing (SB) effort can be common, altering these waveforms and reducing the accuracy of identified, model-based, and patient-specific lung mechanics.

methodsChanges in patient-specific lung elastance over a pressure-volume (PV) loop, identified using hysteresis loop analysis (HLA), are used to detect the occurrence of asynchrony and identify its type and pattern. The identified HLA parameters are then combined with a nonlinear mechanics hysteresis loop model (HLM) to extract and reconstruct ventilated waveforms unaffected by asynchronous breaths. Asynchrony magnitude can then be quantified using an energy-dissipation metric, E

resultsRoot mean square errors for reconstructed PV loops are within 5% for test-lung experimental data, and 10% for over 90% of clinical data. E

conclusionsExperimental test-lung validation demonstrates the method's reconstruction accuracy and generality in controlled scenarios. Clinical validation matches direct observations of asynchrony in incidence and quantifies magnitude, including cases without asynchrony, validating its robustness and potential efficacy as a clinical real-time asynchrony monitoring tool.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsHumansModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsRespiratory Function TestsAsynchronyHysteresis loop modelHysteretic lung mechanicsLung mechanicsMechanical ventilationVirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID35255922
PMCPMC8900099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.