ArticleBMC health services research2022
Talking together in rural palliative care: a qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in Norway.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practices and perspectives on dying at home in Norwegian home care services - a secondary analysis of qualitative data.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Palliative care in rural, remote, and northern communities: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Preparing for home death in rural areas - the experience of family caregivers providing palliative cancer care.International journal of circumpolar health · 2025Article
- Exploring spiritual needs in older adults with chronic illnesses across diverse cultures in China s: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- The transition from oncology to palliative care: barriers and facilitators explored through an integrative review.BMC palliative care · 2025Review
- Experiences of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in home settings - a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Exploring nurse practitioners' collaboration with general practitioners in Norwegian homecare services: a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Community out-of-hours palliative care - 'It's a patchwork of services': A qualitative study exploring care provision.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Caregiver experience of specialist hospice palliative care in rural communities: A qualitative study exploring rural culture, hospice nurse characteristics, roles, and carer strategic ideas.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Collaboration, coordination and communication as facilitators of transitions for patients with advanced cancer: a scoping review linked to the Pal-Cycles project.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Exploring End-of-Life Care for Patients with Breast Cancer, Dementia or Heart Failure: A Register-Based Study of Individual and Institutional Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dying at "home" - a qualitative study of end-of-life care in rural Northern Norway from the perspective of health care professionals.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Specialist and Primary Physicians' Experiences and Perspectives of Collaboration While Caring for Palliative Patients-A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Palliative care in rural areas - collaboration between district nurses and doctors: an interview study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Mitigating Moral Injury for Palliative Care Clinicians.Palliative medicine reports · 2023Article
- Global Research Trend and Bibliometric Analysis of Current Studies on End-of-Life Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Finding their place - general practitioners' experiences with palliative care-a Norwegian qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Experiences and Associated Factors in a Norwegian Radiotherapy Setting: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaring for people with palliative care needs in their homes requires close collaboration within and between primary and hospital care. However, such close collaboration is often lacking. Transitions of care are potentially unsafe and distressing points in a patient trajectory. Few studies have explored the experiences of healthcare professionals in the community who receive patients from hospital care and provide them with palliative care at home.
objectiveTo explore how rural health professionals experience local and regional collaboration on patients in need of palliative care.
methodsThis was a qualitative focus group and interview study in rural Northern Norway involving 52 primary care health professionals including district nurses, general practitioners, oncology nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists. Five uni-professional focus group discussions were followed by five interprofessional discussions and six individual interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically.
results"Talking together" was perceived as the optimal form of collaboration, both within primary care and with specialists. Nurses and GPs had similar perceptions of their worst-case scenario in primary palliative care: the sudden arrival after working hours of a sick patient about whom they lacked information. These situations could be the result of a short notice transfer from secondary care or an emergency presentation after a crisis in patient management locally, the latter often resulting in a hospital admission. Participants missed timely and detailed discharge letters and in complex cases a telephone call or conference. Locally, co-location was perceived as advantageous for crucial communication, mutual support, and knowledge about each other's competencies and work schedule. Because local health professionals belonged to different units within the primary health care organisation, in some places they had limited knowledge about each other's roles and skill sets.
conclusionsLack of communication, both locally and between specialist and primary care, was a key factor in the worst-case patient scenarios for GPs and nurses working in primary palliative care in rural Northern Norway. Co-location of primary care professionals promoted local collaboration and should be encouraged. Hospital discharge planning should involve the receiving primary care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.