Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255912›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

The relationship between capacity and utilization of nonpharmacologic therapies in the US Military Health System.

Rendelle Bolton, Grant Ritter, Krista Highland, Mary Jo Larson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rendelle BoltonThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA. rendelle.bolton@va.gov.
Grant RitterThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA.
Krista HighlandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Uniformed Services University, 11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 709, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
Mary Jo LarsonThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MA, 02453, Waltham, USA.
Brandeis University · USDefense & Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management · US

Funding

Trajectories of non-pharmacologic and opioid health services for pain management in association with military readiness and health status outcomes: SUPIC renewalR01AT008404 · NCCIH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, RACHEL SAYKO, LARSON, MARY JO · 2014 to 2023
$7.2M
First Longitudinal Study of Missed Treatment Opportunities Using DOD and VA DataR01DA030150 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, MARY JO · 2010 to 2013
$1.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008404NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonpharmacologic therapies (NPTs) are recommended as first-line treatments for pain, however the impact of expanding professional capacity to deliver these therapies on use has not been extensively studied. We sought to examine whether an effort by the US Military Health System (MHS) to improve access to NPTs by expanding professional capacity increased NPT utilization in a cohort at higher risk for pain - Army soldiers returning from deployment.

methodsOur study involved secondary analysis of MHS workforce data derived from the Defense Medical Human Resources System Internet (DMHRSi), and healthcare utilization data obtained from two ambulatory record systems of the Military Health System (MHS) for a sample of 863,855 Army soldiers previously deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan over a 10-year period (2008-2017). We measured clinical provider capacity in three occupational groups responsible for pain management at 130 military treatment facilities (MTFs): physical therapy, chiropractic, and behavioral health, measured annually as full-time equivalence per 100,000 patients served at each MTF. Utilization in both direct and purchased care settings was measured as annual mean NPT users per 1000 sample members and mean encounters per NPT user. Generalized estimating equation models estimated the associations of facility-level occupational capacity measures and facility-level utilization NPT measures.

resultsIn 2008, nearly all MTFs had some physical therapist and behavioral health provider capacity, but less than half had any chiropractor capacity. The largest increase in capacity from 2008 to 2017 was for chiropractors (89%) followed by behavioral health providers (77%) and physical therapists (37%). Models indicated that increased capacity of physical therapists and chiropractors were associated with significantly increased utilization of six out of seven NPTs. Acupuncture initiation was associated with capacity increases in each occupation. Increased professional capacity in MTFs was associated with limited but positive effects on NPT utilization in purchased care.

conclusionsIncreasing occupational capacity in three professions responsible for delivering NPTs at MTFs were associated with growing utilization of seven NPTs in this Army sample. Despite increasing capacity in MTFs, some positive associations between MTF capacity and purchased care utilization suggest an unmet need for NPTs. Future research should examine if these changes lead to greater receipt of guideline-concordant pain management.

Indexed as

Military Health ServicesMilitary PersonnelCohort StudiesHumansPain ManagementPatient Acceptance of Health CareAccessComplementary and integrative healthHealthcare utilizationMilitaryNonpharmacologic therapiesPain therapyPhysical therapyProfessional capacity

Identifiers

PMID35255912
PMCPMC8900315
OpenAlexW4220666732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.