Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255886›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Efficacy and safety of a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion in L4-5 lumbar degenerative diseases compared with traditional XLIF and OLIF: a retrospective cohort study of 156 cases.

Jiaqi Li, Yapeng Sun, Lei Guo, Fei Zhang, Wenyuan Ding, Wei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiaqi LiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China.
Yapeng SunDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China.
Lei GuoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China.
Fei ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China.
Wenyuan DingDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, China. zhangweiat430@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-4087
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

Bureau of Science and Technology of Hebei Province 20377750DDepartment of Health of Hebei Province
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors designed a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure named as XOLIF and compared the efficacy and safety with traditional LLIF procedures.

methodsPatients were divided into XLIF, OLIF, and XOLIF group according to the surgical approach. Cases of psoas major and vascular space stenosis, psoas major muscle elevation, psoas major muscle hypertrophy, and high iliac crest were recorded. Basic information, composition ratio of specific cases, Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), interbody fusion rate and complications were compared between the 3 groups.

resultsThe study included 156 cases of L4-5 LLIF. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, BMI among the three groups. Cases with stenosis between psoas muscle and artery accounted for 11.8 and 18.4% of the XLIF and XOLIF group, respectively, while no case of this type had undergone OLIF surgery, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The proportions of high iliac crest cases in the OLIF and XOLIF group were 12.5 and 18.4%, respectively, while the XLIF group with vertical approach is not suitable for cases with high iliac crest. The postoperative VAS and ODI of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation. There were 51 cases (32.7%) of complications including 21cases in XLIF group, 20 cases in OLIF Group and 10 cases in XOLIF group. XOLIF group has more advantages in reducing lumbar plexus injury and the risk of vascular injury.

conclusionsXOLIF showed good clinical efficacy and technical advantages with a low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, especially in the specific cases.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionHumansLumbosacral RegionPsoas MusclesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationExtreme lateral interbody fusionLateral lumbar interbody fusionModified procedureOblique lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID35255886
PMCPMC8903737
OpenAlexW4220791163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.