Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255653›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2022

Effects and safety of COVID-19 vaccination on assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy: A comprehensive review and joint statements of the KSRM, the KSRI, and the KOSAR.

Ae Ra Han, Dayong Lee, Seul Ki Kim, Chang Woo Choo, Joon Cheol Park, Jung Ryeol Lee, Won Jun Choi, Jin Hyun Jun, Jeong Ho Rhee, Seok Hyun Kim and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19, Vaccination, and Female Fertility in the Czech Republic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ae Ra HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Fertility Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Dayong LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Seul Ki KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang Woo ChooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Cheol ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jung Ryeol LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Jun ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hyun JunEulji Medi-Bio Research Institute (EMBRI), Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Ho RheeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Seok Hyun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine (KSRM)
Korean Society for Reproductive Immunology (KSRI)
Korean Society for Assisted Reproduction (KOSAR)
Seoul National University · KRKeimyung University · KRCHA University · KREulji University · KRGyeongsang National University · KRKyungpook National University · KRMaria Fertility Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humanity is in the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and vaccines-including mRNA vaccines-have been developed at an unprecedented speed. It is necessary to develop guidelines for vaccination for people undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and for pregnancy-related situations based on the extant laboratory and clinical data. COVID-19 vaccines do not appear to adversely affect gametes, embryos, or implantation; therefore, active vaccination is recommended for women or men who are preparing for ART. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) for the treatment of immune-related infertility is unlikely to impact the effectiveness of the vaccines, so COVID-19 vaccines can be administered around ART cycles in which IVIG is scheduled. Pregnant women have been proven to be at risk of severe maternal and neonatal complications from COVID-19. It does not appear that COVID-19 vaccines harm pregnant women or fetuses; instead, they have been observed to deliver antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) to the fetus. Accordingly, it is recommended that pregnant women receive COVID-19 vaccination. There is no rationale for adverse effects, or clinical cases of adverse reactions, in mothers or neonates after COVID-19 vaccination in lactating women. Instead, antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 can be delivered through breast milk. Therefore, breastfeeding mothers should consider vaccination. In summary, active administration of COVID-19 vaccines will help ensure the safe implementation of ART, pregnancy, and breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductive technologyCOVID-19LactationPregnancyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35255653
PMCPMC8923627
OpenAlexW4214544123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.