Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255310›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2022

Differential ETS1 binding to T:G mismatches within a CpG dinucleotide contributes to C-to-T somatic mutation rate of the IDH2 hotspot at codon Arg140.

Jie Yang, Esha Gupta, John R Horton, Robert M Blumenthal, Xing Zhang, Xiaodong Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie YangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: JYang19@mdanderson.org.
Esha GuptaDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: es.anu.gupta@gmail.com.
John R HortonDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: JRHorton@mdanderson.org.
Robert M BlumenthalDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, and Program in Bioinformatics, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA. Electronic address: Robert.Blumenthal@utoledo.edu.
Xing ZhangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: XZhang21@mdanderson.org.
Xiaodong ChengDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: XCheng5@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

Epigenetic regulations of DNA and histone methylation and deMethylation: Structures and MechanismsR35GM134744 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Xiaodong Cheng · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
MD Anderson Summer Program in Cancer Research (SPCR)R25CA181004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MARK T. BEDFORD, Joya Chandra · 2014 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA181004NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytosine to thymine (C>T) somatic mutation is highly enriched in certain types of cancer, and most commonly occurs via deamination of a 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to thymine, in the context of a CpG dinucleotide. In theory, deamination should occur at equal rates to both 5mC nucleotides on opposite strands. In most cases, the resulting T:G or G:T mismatch can be repaired by thymine DNA glycosylase activities. However, while some hotspot-associated CpG mutations have approximately equal numbers of mutations that resulted either from C>T or G>A in a CpG dinucleotide, many showed strand bias, being skewed toward C>T of the first base pair or G>A of the second base pair. Using the IDH2 Arg140 codon as a case study, we show that the two possible T:G mismatches at the codon-specific CpG site have differing effects on transcription factor ETS1 binding affinity, differentially affecting access of a repair enzyme (MBD4) to the deamination-caused T:G mismatch. Our study thus provides a plausible mechanism for exclusion of repair enzymes by the differential binding of transcription factors affecting the rate at which the antecedent opposite-strand mutations occur.

Indexed as

EndodeoxyribonucleasesThymineCodonCytosineDNADNA RepairMutation RateCodonCytosineDNAEndodeoxyribonucleasesThymine5mC deamination5-methylcytosineCpG dinucleotideETS1IDH2 hotspot mutationMBD4T:G mismatch

Identifiers

PMID35255310
PMCPMC9411267
OpenAlexW4214759166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.