ArticleDNA repair2022
Differential ETS1 binding to T:G mismatches within a CpG dinucleotide contributes to C-to-T somatic mutation rate of the IDH2 hotspot at codon Arg140.
Article in DNA repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mediating and maintaining methylation while minimizing mutation: Recent advances on mammalian DNA methyltransferases.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cytosine to thymine (C>T) somatic mutation is highly enriched in certain types of cancer, and most commonly occurs via deamination of a 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to thymine, in the context of a CpG dinucleotide. In theory, deamination should occur at equal rates to both 5mC nucleotides on opposite strands. In most cases, the resulting T:G or G:T mismatch can be repaired by thymine DNA glycosylase activities. However, while some hotspot-associated CpG mutations have approximately equal numbers of mutations that resulted either from C>T or G>A in a CpG dinucleotide, many showed strand bias, being skewed toward C>T of the first base pair or G>A of the second base pair. Using the IDH2 Arg140 codon as a case study, we show that the two possible T:G mismatches at the codon-specific CpG site have differing effects on transcription factor ETS1 binding affinity, differentially affecting access of a repair enzyme (MBD4) to the deamination-caused T:G mismatch. Our study thus provides a plausible mechanism for exclusion of repair enzymes by the differential binding of transcription factors affecting the rate at which the antecedent opposite-strand mutations occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.