ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022
Development and Validation of the Trust in My Doctor, Trust in Doctors in General, and Trust in the Health Care Team Scales.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Race differences in patient trust and distrust from audio-recorded cardiology encounters.Patient education and counseling · 2024Trial
- Article
- Constructing a Conceptual Model for Measuring Physician-Patient Trust: Integrating Theory and Research.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Patient-Centred Communication and Behavioural Guidance: An Exploratory Evaluation of the Trainer-Doctor Model in Dental Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cognitive Testing of the People's Voice Survey Instrument to Assess Adults' and Adolescents' Experience in European Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors influencing confidence and trust in health professionals: a cross-sectional study of English general practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Development of Survey Measures of Uncontrolled Vaping and Vaping Restraint.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Trust transfer from medical AI to doctors and hospitals: Integrating digital, AI, and scientific literacy in a cross-sectional framework.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Measuring trust in healthcare with instruments developed in different disciplines - A scoping review.Nursing ethics · 2025Article
- Online Health Information-Seeking in the Era of Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Discrimination and Poor Provider Communication on Public Trust in Cancer Advice From Physicians.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- The Role of Boundary Spanning in Building Trust: A Place-Based Study on Engaging Hardly Reached Groups in Community Healthcare Settings.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Racial discrimination and health-care system trust among American adults with and without cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Internet usage time and trust in doctors: evidence from China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.Journal of caring sciences · 2024Article
- African American and Hispanic Cancer Survivors' and Caregivers' Experiences in Nebraska.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.Annual review of public health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleHistoric and present-day racism and inequity in the United States (U.S.) have resulted in diminished trust in health care among many populations. A key barrier to improving trust in health care is a dearth of well-validated measures appropriate for diverse populations. Indeed, systematic reviews indicate a need to develop and test updated trust measures that are multidimensional and inclusive of relevant domains (e.g., fairness).
objectiveWe developed three trust measures: the Trust in My Doctor (T-MD), Trust in Doctors in General (T-DiG), and Trust in the Health Care Team (T-HCT) scales.
methodsAfter developing an initial item pool, expert reviewers (n = 6) provided feedback on the face validity of each scale. We conducted cognitive interviews (n = 21) with a convenience sample of adults to ensure items were interpreted as intended. In 2020, we administered an online survey to a convenience sample of U.S. adults recruited through the Qualtrics Panel (n = 801) to assess scale reliability and validity.
resultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated acceptable model fit for second order latent factor models for each scale (root mean square error of approximation: <0.07, comparative fit index: ≥0.98, and standardized root mean square residual: ≤0.03). The T-MD contained 25 items and six subscales: communication competency, fidelity, systems trust, confidentiality, fairness, and global trust. The T-DiG and T-HCT each contained 29 items and seven subscales (the same subscales in the T-MD plus an additional subscale related to stigma-based discrimination). Each scale was strongly correlated with existing trust measures and perceived racism in health care and was significantly associated with delayed health care seeking and receipt of a routine health exam.
conclusionsThe multidimensional T-MD, T-DiG, and T-HCT scales have sound psychometric properties and may be useful for researchers evaluating trust-related interventions or conducting studies where trust is an important construct or main outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.