Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35255091›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Feasibility of a home-based physiotherapy intervention to promote post-stroke mobility: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Ameerani Jarbandhan, Jerry Toelsie, DirkJan Veeger, Robbert Bipat, Luc Vanhees, Roselien Buys

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Combined cardiorespiratory and resistance training for people with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Home-Based Gait Interventions for Adults with Stroke: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  8. The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ameerani JarbandhanDept. of Anatomy, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.
Jerry ToelsieDept. of Physiology, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.
DirkJan VeegerDept. of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Robbert BipatDept. of Physiology, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-4737
Luc VanheesDept. of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Roselien BuysDept. of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8379-3971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHome-based physiotherapy interventions to improve post-stroke mobility are successful in high-income countries. These programs require less resources compared to center-based programs. However, feasibility of such an intervention in a low and middle-income setting remains unknown. Therefore, the SunRISe (Stroke Rehabilitation In Suriname) study aimed to assess feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a home-based semi-supervised physiotherapy intervention to promote post-stroke mobility in a low resource setting.

designProspective randomized controlled trial.

methodsChronic stroke patients were recruited and randomized into either an intervention group (IG (N = 20)) or a control group (CG (N = 10)). The IG received a 3-days-a-week home-based physiotherapy program that was supervised in the first 4 weeks and tele-supervised during the second 4 weeks. The physiotherapy program consisted of walking as well as functional and mobilization exercises. The CG received usual care. Feasibility outcome measures included adherence, patient satisfaction and safety. Efficacy measures included functional exercise tolerance (six-minute walking test (6MWT), functional balance (Berg Balance Score (BBS), upper extremity (UE) function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire), and UE strength ((non-)paretic handgrip (HG) strength). Two-way analysis of variance was used for data analysis.

resultsThirty participants (61.8 ± 9.2 years old, 13 men) were enrolled in the study. The intervention was completed by 14 participants (70%). Adherence was affected by rainy season associated infrastructural problems (n = 2), the medical status of participants (n = 3) and insufficient motivation to continue the program without direct supervision (n = 1). No adverse events were noted and participants were satisfied with the program. Functional exercise tolerance (57.2 ± 67.3m, p = 0.02) and UE function (-9.8 ± 15.2, p = 0.04) improved in the IG compared to no change in the CG. HG strength was unaltered and a ceiling effect occurred for BBS.

conclusionOur home-based semi-supervised physiotherapy intervention seems safe, associated with moderate to high levels of engagement and patient satisfaction and results in functional improvements.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthStroke RehabilitationAgedExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPilot ProjectsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35255091
PMCPMC8901054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.