ReviewThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2022
Privacy and Health Practices in the Digital Age.
Review in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024Pooled it
- Fully automated system predicts osteoporotic vertebral fracture across institutions using lumbar MRI paraspinal muscle signatures.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- "Family-as-Root" and "Family-Centeredness" in hospice care: a concept analysis and implications for nursing practice.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- "Doing no harm" in the digital age: navigating tradeoffs and operational considerations for privacy-preserving deep learning in medicine.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prediabetes care: applications in screening, risk prediction, and lifestyle intervention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Determining what patients admitted with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation will use for remote clinical monitoring: a patient engagement survey.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- The risk of neurotechnology as an instrument of colonialism.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- Data, Privacy, and Agency: Beyond Transparency to Empowerment.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2022Article
- Asking questions that matter - Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing privacy concerns are arising from expanding use of aggregated personal information in health practices. Conversely, in light of the promising benefits of data driven healthcare, privacy is being frequently dismissed as outdated, costly and ultimately egotistical. This paper aims to review the theoretical framework on privacy in order to overcome the often simplistic debate between the primacy of individual or collective interests. As a result, it is argued that although privacy can be understood as freedom of personal choice in matters of sharing intimacy, it is foundational to both community belonging and to social and political organizations at large. Ethical decisions on the use of data analytics technologies in health practices should also take into account the social effects of violating privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35254963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.