Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254901›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Global patterns in the predator satiation effect of masting: A meta-analysis.

Rafał Zwolak, Paulina Celebias, Michał Bogdziewicz

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Geography of masting creates greater synchrony in seed scarcity than in seed abundance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mast seeding is stronger in taller plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafał ZwolakDepartment of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-5033
Paulina CelebiasDepartment of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9916-2904
Michał BogdziewiczDepartment of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6777-9034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceMasting, or synchronous production of large seed crops, is widespread among plants. The predator satiation hypothesis states that masting evolved to overwhelm seed predators with an excess of food. Yet, this popular explanation faced few rigorous tests. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that related the magnitude of seed production to the intensity of seed predation. Our results validate certain theoretical notions (e.g., that predator satiation is more effective at higher latitudes) but challenge others (e.g., that specialist and generalist consumers differ in the type of functional response to masting). We also found that masting is losing its ability to satiate consumers, probably because global warming affected masting patterns. This shift might considerably impair the reproduction of masting plants.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPlantsPredatory BehaviorSeedsAnimalseconomy of scaleglobal changegranivoryplant–animal interactionsseed production

Identifiers

PMID35254901
PMCPMC8931228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.