Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254622›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2023

A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.

Maria-Grazia Lazzaroni, Silvia Piantoni, Fabrizio Angeli, Stefania Bertocchi, Franco Franceschini, Paolo Airò

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nintedanib in systemic sclerosis treatment: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis treatment: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria-Grazia LazzaroniRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1860-6866
Silvia PiantoniRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-0197
Fabrizio AngeliRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5990-2979
Stefania BertocchiRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-8254
Franco FranceschiniRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. franco.franceschini@unibs.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-6124
Paolo AiròRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-1918
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease, characterized by the presence of three main actors: vasculopathy, immune activation, and fibrosis. This pathologic process is then translated in a clinical picture with great variability among different patients in terms of type of organ involvement, disease severity and prognosis. This heterogeneity is a main feature of SSc, which, in addition to the presence of early phases of the disease characterized by mild symptoms, can explain the high difficulty in establishing classification criteria, and in defining patients' subsets and disease outcomes. The definition of disease outcomes is particularly relevant in the setting of clinical trials, where the aim is to provide reliable endpoints, able to measure the magnitude of the efficacy of a certain drug or intervention. For this reason, in the last years, increasing efforts have been done to design measures of disease activity, damage, severity, and response to treatment, often in the context of composite indexes. When considering disease outcomes, the experience of the patient represents a relevant and complementary aspect. The tools able to capture this experience, the patient-reported outcomes, have been increasingly used in the last years in clinical practice and in clinical trials, both as primary and secondary endpoints. This comprehensive narrative review on SSc will therefore cover pathogenetic and histopathologic aspects, epidemiology, classification systems, and disease outcome measures, in order to focus on issues that are relevant for clinical research and design of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, SystemicFibrosisHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisClassificationDisease outcomesEpidemiologyPatient-reported outcomesSystemic sclerosisVasculopathy

Identifiers

PMID35254622
PMCPMC10167186
OpenAlexW4220920331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.