ArticleSurgery today2022
The clinical management of peripancreatic fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePeripancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a frequent radiological finding on postoperative computed tomography (CT) after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We evaluated the risk factors for drainage of PFC after DP to clarify the optimal management of PFC.
methodsThis study included 85 patients who underwent elective DP between January 2010 and December 2020. PFC was defined as an area of fluid located at the pancreatic resection margin on postoperative routine CT on approximately postoperative day 7 (first CT). We retrospectively investigated the relationship between clinical variables, including CT findings and PFC drainage.
resultsDrainage was performed in 19 patients (22.4%). Drainage for PFC was significantly associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay, higher PFC volume, presence of air bubbles, and higher white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of the first CT. According to the multivariate analyses, a PFC volume ≥ 60 mL and WBC count ≥ 12,400/μL on the day of the first CT were independent risk factors for PFC drainage after DP. The combination of these 2 factors showed 73.7% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity.
conclusionThe PFC volume and WBC count at the first CT were significantly associated with PFC drainage and may help determine the appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.