Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254519›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

A propensity score-matched analysis of breast-conserving surgery plus whole-breast irradiation versus mastectomy in breast cancer.

Francesca Magnoni, Giovanni Corso, Patrick Maisonneuve, Giulia Massari, Luca Alberti, Giulia Castelnovo, Maria Cristina Leonardi, Virgilio Sacchini, Viviana Galimberti, Paolo Veronesi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca Magnoni *Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. francesca.magnoni@ieo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-988X
Giovanni Corso *Division of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giulia MassariDivision of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca AlbertiDivision of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giulia CastelnovoDivision of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Maria Cristina LeonardiDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Virgilio SacchiniBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Viviana GalimbertiDivision of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Paolo VeronesiDivision of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS Support Grant P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent observations regarding long-term outcomes among patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus whole-breast irradiation (WBI) or mastectomy are from a small number of registry-based studies. Therefore, these findings may overestimate differences in survival between the two groups, compared with randomized controlled trials conducted in the 1980s. The aim of this study is to compare long-term outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics between patients treated with BCS + WBI or mastectomy for BC.

methodsWe performed a propensity score-matched analysis in a cohort of 9710 patients aged < 70 years who underwent BCS + WBI or mastectomy without external radiotherapy for a first primary BC (pT1-2, N0-3a) at the European Institute of Oncology between 2000 and 2008. Patients were matched by propensity score.

resultsMedian follow-up was 8.4 years (interquartile range 6.5-10.2). The cumulative incidence of axillary lymph node recurrence at 10 years was lower in the BCS + WBI group [2.4% (95% CI, 1.7-3.3%)] than in the mastectomy group [4.4% (95% CI, 3.5-5.5%)] (P = .0005), and the cumulative incidence of contralateral BC was higher in the BCS + WBI group [3.9% (95% CI, 2.8-5.1%)] than in the mastectomy group [2.5% (95% CI, 1.7-3.4%)] (P = .01). Among the 366 patients with HER2 subtype BC, BCS + WBI was associated with a fivefold higher risk [hazard ratio 4.97 (95% CI, 2.28-10.8)] of  ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), compared with mastectomy (P < .0001); however, among patients with other BC subtypes, the rates of IBTR were not statistically significantly different.

conclusionPatients with HER2 subtype BC (T1-2, N0-3) who underwent BCS + WBI had a statistically significantly higher risk of IBTR than patients who underwent mastectomy. Survival was not statistically significantly different between the groups.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPropensity ScoreRadiotherapy, AdjuvantBreast cancerBreast conserving surgeryHER2MastectomyOutcomeRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35254519
PMCPMC11328321
OpenAlexW4221059314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.