Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254488›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2022

Differential impact of JUUL flavors on pulmonary immune modulation and oxidative stress responses in male and female mice.

Terek Been, Hussein Traboulsi, Sofia Paoli, Bayan Alakhtar, Koren K Mann, David H Eidelman, Carolyn J Baglole

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Vaping-related lung disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  5. The respiratory epithelium in the era of vaping: insights fromEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. NAM journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Terek BeenDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hussein TraboulsiResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sofia PaoliDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Bayan AlakhtarDivision of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Koren K MannDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David H EidelmanResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Carolyn J BagloleDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Carolyn.baglole@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-0437
McGill University Health Centre · CAJewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR HEV-172889Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health PJT-168836Institute of Infection and Immunity PJT-162273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

JUUL is a popular e-cigarette brand that manufactures e-liquids in a variety of flavors, such as mango and mint. Despite their popularity, the pulmonary effects of flavored JUUL e-liquids that are aerosolized and subsequently inhaled are not known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate if acute exposure to JUUL e-cigarette aerosols in three popular flavors elicits an immunomodulatory or oxidative stress response in mice. We first developed a preclinical model that mimics human use patterns of e-cigarettes using 1 puff/min or 4 puffs/min exposure regimes. Based on cotinine levels, these exposures were representative of light/occasional and moderate JUUL users. We then exposed C57BL/6 mice to JUUL e-cigarette aerosols in mango, mint, and Virginia tobacco flavors containing 5% nicotine for 3 days, and assessed the inflammatory and oxidative stress response in the lungs and blood. In response to the 1 puff/min regime (light/occasional user), there were minimal changes in BAL cell composition or lung mRNA expression. However, at 4 puffs/min (moderate user), mint-flavored JUUL significantly increased lung neutrophils, while mango-flavored JUUL significantly increased Tnfα and Il13 mRNA in the lungs. Both the 1- and 4 puffs/min regimes significantly increased oxidative stress markers in the blood, indicating systemic effects. Thus, JUUL products are not inert; even short-term inhalation of flavored JUUL e-cigarette aerosols differentially causes immune modulation and oxidative stress responses.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAerosolsAnimalsFemaleFlavoring AgentsLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOxidative StressRNA, MessengerAerosolsFlavoring AgentsRNA, MessengerCotininee-CigaretteInflammationJUULLungsOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID35254488
OpenAlexW4221060100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.