Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254476›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2022

Tenodesis yields better functional results than tenotomy in long head of the biceps tendon operations-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mátyás Vajda, Lajos Szakó, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss, Anikó Görbe, Zsolt Molnár, Kincső Kozma, Gergő Józsa, László Bucsi, Károly Schandl

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mátyás VajdaInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Lajos SzakóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Anikó GörbeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 2nd floor, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Kincső KozmaDepartment of Ophtalmology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Rákóczi út 2, 7623, Pécs, Hungary.
Gergő JózsaDepartment of Paediatrics, Surgical Division, University of Pécs, József Attila u. 7, 7623, Pécs, Hungary.
László Bucsi *Saint George University Teaching Hospital of County-Fejér, Seregélyesi u. 3., 8000, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Károly Schandl *Saint George University Teaching Hospital of County-Fejér, Seregélyesi u. 3., 8000, Székesfehérvár, Hungary. karoly.schandl@gmail.com.
University of Pecs · HUPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is a common disorder affecting muscle function and causing considerable pain for the patient. The literature on the two surgical treatment methods (tenotomy and tenodesis) is controversial; therefore, our aim was to compare the results of these interventions.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis using the following strategy: (P) patients with LHBT pathology, (I) tenodesis, (C) tenotomy, (O) elbow flexion and forearm supination strength, pain assessed on the ten-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), bicipital cramping pain, Constant, ASES, and SST score, Popeye deformity, and operative time. We included only randomized clinical trials. We searched five databases. During statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, using the Bayesian method with random effect model.

resultsWe included 11 studies in the systematic review, nine of these were eligible for the meta-analysis, containing data about 572 patients (279 in the tenodesis, 293 in the tenotomy group). Our analysis concluded that tenodesis is more beneficial considering 12-month elbow flexion strength (WMD: 3.67 kg; p = 0.006), 12-month forearm supination strength (WMD: 0.36 kg; p = 0.012), and 24-month Popeye deformity (OR: 0.19; p < 0.001), whereas tenotomy was associated with decreased 3-month pain scores on VAS (WMD: 0.99; p < 0.001). We did not find significant difference among the other outcomes.

conclusionTenodesis yields better results in terms of biceps function and is non-inferior regarding long-term pain, while tenotomy is associated with earlier pain relief.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesTenodesisArthroscopyBayes TheoremHumansMuscle, SkeletalPainTendonsTenotomyLHBTLong head of the biceps tendonMeta-analysisRotator cuffShoulder arthroscopySystematic reviewTenodesisTenotomy

Identifiers

PMID35254476
PMCPMC9001564
OpenAlexW4221013507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.