Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254473›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2022

CO

Ana Silvia Seki, Ana Maria H M Bianchi-Ferraro, Eliana S M Fonseca, Marair G F Sartori, Manoel J B C Girão, Zsuzsanna I K Jarmy-Di Bella

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Vaginal lasers for treating stress urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Fractional COInternational urogynecology journal · 2023
    Trial
  10. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence in females.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Energies and new technologies in pelvic and pelvic floor dysfunctions.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2024 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Female stress urinary incontinence.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Silvia SekiDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Maria H M Bianchi-FerraroDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil. anamariahmb@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-8915
Eliana S M FonsecaDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marair G F SartoriDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel J B C GirãoDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
Zsuzsanna I K Jarmy-Di BellaDepartment of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, Alameda Jaú 759, SP, 01420-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRYahoo (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisFemale stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition, and conservative treatment options are needed. Were evaluated CO

methodsOne hundred thirty-nine women with SUI were eligible and randomized in a three-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial into radiofrequency (RF), laser (LS) and sham control (SCT) groups, with 3-monthly outpatient treatment sessions. One hundred fourteen women were included, 38 in each group, during a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcomes were: subjective improvement of SUI, evaluated on a Likert scale, and objective cure, which was a composite outcome defined according to negative stress tests, voiding diary and pad test. Questionnaires were also applied. The sample size was calculated to provide 80% power to identify a 20% difference between groups, p < 0.05.

resultsSubjective improvement and objective cure of SUI were identified respectively in 72.6% and 45.2% in LS and in 61.7% and 44.7% in RF, both significantly higher than the 30.0% and 14.0% in SCT. Considering only mild cases (pad test < 10 g), objective cure was achieved in 66.7% in LS, 63.6% in RF and 22.2% in SCT. Significant reduction in the number of episodes of urinary incontinence was found according to voiding diaries (p = 0.029) and pad weight (p = 0.021). A significant reduction in urgency and urinary loss during sexual intercourse was observed only with LS and RF. Improvement in quality of life was also verified by the I-QoL and ICIQ-SF in favor of the energy-treated groups.

conclusionsCO

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressCarbon DioxideControl GroupsFemaleHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeCarbon DioxideLaserRadiofrequencyRCTStress urinary incontinenceTreatment

Identifiers

PMID35254473
OpenAlexW4220832946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.