Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254468›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Anatomical and functional outcomes of non-obstetric urogenital fistula repair.

Dmitry Pushkar, George Kasyan, Rustam Sheripbaev, Shukrat Mukhtarov, Luydmila Tikhonova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitry PushkarUrology Department, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Vuchetich str. 21/2, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127206.
George KasyanUrology Department, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Vuchetich str. 21/2, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127206. g.kasyan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-2217
Rustam SheripbaevRepublican Specialized Center of Scientific and Practical Urology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Shukrat MukhtarovRepublican Specialized Center of Scientific and Practical Urology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Luydmila TikhonovaUrology Department, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Vuchetich str. 21/2, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127206.
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RUTashkent Pediatric Medical Institute · UZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisStudies on non-obstetric urogenital fistulas (NOUGFs) provide limited information on predictive outcome factors. This study was aimed at specifying and analyzing the risk factors for long-term anatomical and functional results.

methodsA cross-sectional study of surgical repair for non-obstetric urogenital fistula was performed. From 2012 to 2020, a total of 479 patients with urogenital fistulas were treated in two tertiary centers. Patients with isolated ureteral fistulas and rectal injuries were excluded. For evaluation of the long-term results, patients with vesicovaginal and urethrovaginal fistulas with at least 12 months of follow-up were identified and contacted by phone and/or examined in the clinic. The anatomical outcome was assessed by resolution of symptoms and/or clinical examination. The Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) was used for the functional outcomes.

resultsOverall, 425 patients were studied (mean age was 49.8; BMI 27.5; mean fistula size 1.4 cm, mean follow-up was 12 months). Vesicovaginal fistula affected 73% of patients. Hysterectomy without radiation was the most common etiology (66.3%), followed by hysterectomy with subsequent radiation (16%) and pelvic radiotherapy (12.2%). The transvaginal approach was used in 54.4%, abdominal in 12.4%, transvesical in 22.4%, and a combined approach in 10.8%. The successful closure rate was 92.9% for primary cases, 71.6% for secondary cases, and 66.7% for radiation fistulas. A high risk for relapse was found for NOUGFs with ureteral involvement (RR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.5; p = 0.003), radiation fistulas (RR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.5, p = 0.003); and combined radiation and hysterectomy cases (RR 2.9; 95% CI 1.8-4.6; p = 0.0001). In multifactorial analysis, fistula size >3.0 cm, pelvic radiation, and previous vaginal surgeries were associated with a higher risk for failure or lower urinary symptoms.

conclusionsFactors for successful NOUGF closure are fistula size less than 3.0 cm, absence of pelvic radiation, and previous vaginal surgeries.

Indexed as

Ureteral DiseasesUrinary FistulaVaginal FistulaVesicovaginal FistulaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedGenitourinary fistulaNomogramNon-obstetric fistulaReconstructive urologyRisk factorsSurgical fistulaUrogenital fistulaVesicovaginal fistula

Identifiers

PMID35254468
OpenAlexW4221054804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.