Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254387›Full record

ReviewJAMA neurology2022

Multicenter Consensus Approach to Evaluation of Neonatal Hypotonia in the Genomic Era: A Review.

Sarah U Morton, John Christodoulou, Gregory Costain, Francesco Muntoni, Emma Wakeling, Monica H Wojcik, Courtney E French, Anna Szuto, James J Dowling, Ronald D Cohn and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. AIMedGraph: a comprehensive multi-relational knowledge graph for precision medicine.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sarah U MortonDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John ChristodoulouMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Gregory CostainDivision of Clinical & Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Francesco MuntoniNational Institute for Health Research Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma WakelingNorth East Thames Regional Genetic Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Monica H WojcikDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Courtney E FrenchDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anna SzutoDepartment of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James J DowlingProgram for Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ronald D CohnDivision of Clinical & Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
F Lucy RaymondDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Basil T DarrasDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David A WilliamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sebastian LunkeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Zornitza StarkMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David H RowitchDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pankaj B AgrawalDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Genome Sequence-Based Screening for Childhood Risk and Newborn IllnessU19HD077671 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEGGS, ALAN H., GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2018
$6.1M
SPEG is Critical in Skeletal Muscle Development and FunctionR01AR068429 · NIAMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI AGRAWAL, PANKAJ B · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068429NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD077671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceInfants with hypotonia can present with a variety of potentially severe clinical signs and symptoms and often require invasive testing and multiple procedures. The wide range of clinical presentations and potential etiologies leaves diagnosis and prognosis uncertain, underscoring the need for rapid elucidation of the underlying genetic cause of disease. OBSERVATIONS: The clinical application of exome sequencing or genome sequencing has dramatically improved the timely yield of diagnostic testing for neonatal hypotonia, with diagnostic rates of greater than 50% in academic neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US, which compose the International Precision Child Health Partnership (IPCHiP). A total of 74% (17 of 23) of patients had a change in clinical care in response to genetic diagnosis, including 2 patients who received targeted therapy. This narrative review discusses the common causes of neonatal hypotonia, the relative benefits and limitations of available testing modalities used in NICUs, and hypotonia management recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This narrative review summarizes the causes of neonatal hypotonia and the benefits of prompt genetic diagnosis, including improved prognostication and identification of targeted treatments which can improve the short-term and long-term outcomes. Institutional resources can vary among different NICUs; as a result, consideration should be given to rule out a small number of relatively unique conditions for which rapid targeted genetic testing is available. Nevertheless, the consensus recommendation is to use rapid genome or exome sequencing as a first-line testing option for NICU patients with unexplained hypotonia. As part of the IPCHiP, this diagnostic experience will be collected in a central database with the goal of advancing knowledge of neonatal hypotonia and improving evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalMuscle HypotoniaChildConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicExome SequencingGenetic TestingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35254387
PMCPMC10134401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.