Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254307›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2022

Implementation of wedged-serial protein crystallography at PROXIMA-1.

Igor Chaussavoine, Tatiana Isabet, Robin Lener, Pierre Montaville, Ramakrishna Vasireddi, Leonard M G Chavas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microfluidic Devices for High-Throughput In Situ Serial Crystallography.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor ChaussavoineSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Tatiana IsabetSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0142-2307
Robin LenerSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Pierre MontavilleSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ramakrishna VasireddiSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-7436
Leonard M G ChavasNagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-9355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An approach for serial crystallography experiments based on wedged-data collection is described. This is an alternative method for recording in situ X-ray diffraction data on crystalline samples efficiently loaded in an X-ray compatible microfluidic chip. Proper handling of the microfluidic chip places crystalline samples at geometrically known positions with respect to the focused X-ray interaction area for serial data collection of small wedges. The integration of this strategy takes advantage of the greatly modular sample environment available on the endstation, which allows access to both in situ and more classical cryo-crystallography with minimum time loss. The method represents another optional data collection approach that adds up to the already large set of methods made available to users. Coupled with the advances in processing serial crystallography data, the wedged-data collection strategy proves highly efficient in minimizing the amount of required sample crystals for recording a complete dataset. From the advances in microfluidic technology presented here, high-throughput room-temperature crystallography experiments may become routine and should be easily extended to industrial use.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayData CollectionX-Ray DiffractionmicrofluidicPROXIMA-1serial crystallography

Identifiers

PMID35254307
PMCPMC8900848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.