Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254195›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2023

Experiences of receiving a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Gogem Topcu, Jacqueline R Mhizha-Murira, Holly Griffiths, Clare Bale, Avril Drummond, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Kristy-Jane Potter, Nikos Evangelou, Roshan das Nair

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Developing a patient care pathway for emotional support around the point of multiple sclerosis diagnosis: A stakeholder engagement study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Illness representation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A preliminary narrative medicine study.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gogem TopcuMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-5686
Jacqueline R Mhizha-MuriraMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-0195
Holly GriffithsMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-9534
Clare BaleMultiple Sclerosis Patient and Public Involvement Group, Nottingham, UK.
Avril DrummondSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-8354
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-8410
Kristy-Jane PotterMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-4321
Nikos EvangelouMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-0672
Roshan das NairMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-7893
University of Nottingham · GBMultiple Sclerosis Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-synthesis aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence on experiences of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in receiving a diagnosis, to derive a conceptual understanding of adjustment to MS diagnosis.

methodsFive electronic databases were systematically searched to identify qualitative studies that explored views and experiences around MS diagnosis. Papers were quality-appraised using a standardised checklist. Data synthesis was guided by principles of meta-ethnography, a well-established interpretive method for synthesising qualitative evidence.

resultsThirty-seven papers were selected (with 874 people with MS). Synthesis demonstrated that around the point of MS diagnosis people experienced considerable emotional upheaval (e.g., shock, denial, anger, fear) and difficulties (e.g., lengthy diagnosis process) that limited their ability to make sense of their diagnosis, leading to adjustment difficulties. However, support resources (e.g., support from clinicians) and adaptive coping strategies (e.g., acceptance) facilitated the adjustment process. Additionally, several unmet emotional and informational support needs (e.g., need for personalised information and tailored emotional support) were identified that, if addressed, could improve adjustment to diagnosis.

conclusionsOur synthesis highlights the need for providing person-centred support and advice at the time of diagnosis and presents a conceptual map of adjustment for designing interventions to improve adjustment following MS diagnosis.Implications for RehabilitationThe period surrounding Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis can be stressful and psychologically demanding.Challenges and disruptions at diagnosis can threaten sense of self, resulting in negative emotions.Adaptive coping skills and support resources could contribute to better adjustment following diagnosis.Support interventions should be tailored to the needs of newly diagnosed people.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAdaptation, PsychologicalAnthropology, CulturalEmotionsHumansQualitative ResearchDiagnosisemotional adjustmentemotionsmultiple sclerosispsychological adaptationqualitative researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35254195
PMCPMC9928430
OpenAlexW4220683801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.