Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254146›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2023

Variability of Glycemic Outcomes and Insulin Requirements Throughout the Menstrual Cycle: A Qualitative Study on Women With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery System.

Darius Mewes, Mandy Wäldchen, Christine Knoll, Klemens Raile, Katarina Braune

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Women living with diabetes: Overlooked and under-recognised, the psychosocial impact.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Darius MewesDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mandy WäldchenSchool of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Christine KnollDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Klemens RaileDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katarina BrauneDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6590-245X
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity College Dublin · IEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of hormone dynamics throughout the menstrual cycle on insulin sensitivity represents a currently under-researched area. Despite therapeutic and technological advances, self-managing insulin therapy remains challenging for women with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

methodsTo investigate perceived changes in glycemic levels and insulin requirements throughout the menstrual cycle and different phases of life, we performed semi-structured interviews with 12 women with T1D who are using personalized open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis with an inductive, hypothesis-generating approach.

resultsParticipants reported significant differences between the follicular phase, ovulation, and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and also during puberty, pregnancy, and menopause. All participants reported increased comfort and safety since using AID, but were still required to manually adjust their therapy according to their cycle. A lack of information and awareness and limited guidance by health care providers were frequently mentioned. Although individual adjustment strategies exist, achieving optimum outcomes was still perceived as challenging.

conclusionsThis study highlights that scientific evidence, therapeutic options, and professional guidance on female health-related aspects in T1D are insufficient to date. Further efforts are required to better inform people with T1D, as well as for health care professionals, researchers, medical device manufacturers, and regulatory bodies to better address female health needs in therapeutic advances.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1InsulinFemaleFollicular PhaseHumansInsulin, Regular, HumanLuteal PhaseMenstrual CycleInsulinInsulin, Regular, Humanautomated insulin deliveryglycemic variabilityinsulin sensitivitymenstrual cycleopen-sourcesex hormones

Identifiers

PMID35254146
PMCPMC10563528
OpenAlexW4220684147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.