Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35254138›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere at Different Growth Stages of Maize Cultivated in Soil Under Conventional and Conservation Agricultural Practices.

Yendi E Navarro-Noya, Yosef Chávez-Romero, Stephanie Hereira-Pacheco, Arit Seleny de León Lorenzana, Bram Govaerts, Nele Verhulst, Luc Dendooven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endobacteria Have a Negative Effect on the Virulence ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yendi E Navarro-NoyaLaboratory of Biotic Interactions, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-7815
Yosef Chávez-RomeroLaboratory of Soil Ecology, Cinvestav, Mexico City, México.
Stephanie Hereira-PachecoLaboratory of Soil Ecology, Cinvestav, Mexico City, México.
Arit Seleny de León LorenzanaLaboratory of Soil Ecology, Cinvestav, Mexico City, México.
Bram GovaertsInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), El Batán, Texcoco, México.
Nele VerhulstInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), El Batán, Texcoco, México.
Luc DendoovenLaboratory of Soil Ecology, Cinvestav, Mexico City, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers in Mexico till soil intensively, remove crop residues for fodder and grow maize often in monoculture. Conservation agriculture (CA), including minimal tillage, crop residue retention and crop diversification, is proposed as a more sustainable alternative. In this study, we determined the effect of agricultural practices and the developing maize rhizosphere on soil bacterial communities. Bulk and maize (Zea mays L.) rhizosphere soil under conventional practices (CP) and CA were sampled during the vegetative, flowering and grain filling stage, and 16S rRNA metabarcoding was used to assess bacterial diversity and community structure. The functional diversity was inferred from the bacterial taxa using PICRUSt. Conservation agriculture positively affected taxonomic and functional diversity compared to CP. The agricultural practice was the most important factor in defining the structure of bacterial communities, even more so than rhizosphere and plant growth stage. The rhizosphere enriched fast growing copiotrophic bacteria, such as Rhizobiales, Sphingomonadales, Xanthomonadales, and Burkholderiales, while in the bulk soil of CP other copiotrophs were enriched, e.g.,

Indexed as

MicrobiotaRhizosphereAgricultureBacteriaPlantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyZea maysRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilcommunity assemblyfunctional diversityintensive agricultural practicesplant microbiomesustainable agriculturetillage

Identifiers

PMID35254138
PMCPMC9049951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.