Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253936›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging of nuclear overhauser effects in acute ischemic stroke.

Yunus Msayib, George W J Harston, Kevin J Ray, James R Larkin, Brad A Sutherland, Fintan Sheerin, Nicholas P Blockley, Thomas W Okell, Peter Jezzard, Andrew Baldwin and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yunus MsayibInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-5840
George W J HarstonAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kevin J RayWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James R LarkinDepartment of Oncology, CRUK and MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-8447
Brad A SutherlandAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fintan SheerinAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicholas P BlockleyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2595-8285
Thomas W OkellWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-0659
Peter JezzardWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-2251
Andrew BaldwinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicola R SibsonDepartment of Oncology, CRUK and MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James KennedyAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael A ChappellWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-4214
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16466Cancer Research UK 16945Cancer Research UK C5255/A15935Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust H2R00080Wellcome Trust WT088877/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging, saturation effects between

methodsMRI data from 12 patients presenting with ischemic stroke were retrospectively analyzed, as well as from six animals induced with an ischemic lesion. Two Bloch-McConnell models (4 pools, and a 3-pool approximation) were compared for their ability to distinguish pathological tissue in acute stroke. The association of NOEs with pH was also explored, using pH phantoms that mimic the intracellular environment of naïve mouse brain.

resultsThe 4-pool measure of NOEs exhibited a different association with tissue outcome compared to 3-pool approximation in the ischemic core and in tissue that underwent delayed infarction. In the ischemic core, the 4-pool measure was elevated in patient white matter (

conclusionAssociations of NOEs with tissue pathology were found using the 4-pool metric that were not observed using the 3-pool approximation. The 4-pool model more adequately captured in vivo changes in NOEs and revealed trends depending on tissue pathology in stroke.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeAnimalsHumansIschemiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceProtonsRetrospective StudiesProtonsacute ischemic strokechemical exchange saturation transfernuclear Overhauser effect

Identifiers

PMID35253936
PMCPMC9314583
OpenAlexW4220690760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.