ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022
Quantified Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumes Differentiate Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia from Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of the burden of young-onset and late-onset dementia in China from 1990 to 2021: A study based on GBD 2021 data.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Smoking predicts brain atrophy in 10,134 healthy individuals and is potentially influenced by body mass index.NPJ dementia · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of brain MRI volumetry in comparing traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Thalamic pathology in frontotemporal dementia: Predilection for specific nuclei, phenotype-specific signatures, clinical correlates, and practical relevance.Brain and behavior · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe differentiation of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) by clinical criteria can be inaccurate. The volumetric quantification of clinically available magnetic resonance (MR) brain scans may facilitate early diagnosis of these neurodegenerative dementias.
objectiveTo determine if volumetric quantification of brain MR imaging can identify persons with bvFTD from EOAD.
methods3D T1 MR brain scans of 20 persons with bvFTD and 45 with EOAD were compared using Neuroreader to measure subcortical, and lobar volumes, and Volbrain for hippocampal subfields. Analyses included: 1) discriminant analysis with leave one out cross-validation; 2) input of predicted probabilities from this process into a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis; and 3) Automated linear regression to identify predictive regions.
resultsBoth groups were comparable in age and sex with no statistically significant differences in symptom duration. bvFTD had lower volume percentiles in frontal lobes, thalamus, and putamen. EOAD had lower parietal lobe volumes. ROC analyses showed 99.3% accuracy with Neuroreader percentiles and 80.2% with subfields. The parietal lobe was the most predictive percentile. Although there were differences in hippocampal (particularly left CA2-CA3) subfields, it did not add to the discriminant analysis.
conclusionPercentiles from an MR based volumetric quantification can help differentiate between bvFTD from EOAD in routine clinical care. Use of hippocampal subfield volumes does not enhance the diagnostic separation of these two early-onset dementias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.