Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253329›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2022

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on risk of prematurity, birthweight and obstetric complications: A multivariate analysis from a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study.

Emmanuel Simon, Jean-Bernard Gouyon, Jonathan Cottenet, Sonia Bechraoui-Quantin, Patrick Rozenberg, Anne-Sophie Mariet, Catherine Quantin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 Not Hypertension or Diabetes Increases the Risk of Preeclampsia among a High-Risk Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel SimonGynaecology, Obstetrics, and Fetal Medicine, University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6442-1013
Jean-Bernard GouyonCentre d'Etudes Périnatales Océan Indien (EA 7388), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sud Réunion, La Réunion, Saint Pierre, France.
Jonathan CottenetBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Sonia Bechraoui-QuantinBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Patrick RozenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hôpital Intercommunal de Poissy, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Poissy, France.
Anne-Sophie MarietBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Catherine QuantinBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5134-9411
Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the impact of maternal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on prematurity, birthweight and obstetric complications.

designNationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study.

settingNational Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information database in France. POPULATION: All single births from March to December 2020: 510 387 deliveries, including 2927 (0.6%) with confirmed COVID-19 in the mother and/or the newborn.

methodsThe group with COVID-19 was compared with the group without COVID-19 using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and the Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regressions were used to study the effect of COVID-19 on the risk of prematurity or macrosomia (birthweight ≥4500 g).

main outcome measuresPrematurity less than 37, less than 28, 28-31, or 32-36 weeks of gestation; birthweight; obstetric complications.

resultsIn singleton pregnancies, COVID-19 was associated with obstetric complications such as hypertension (2.8% versus 2.0%, p < 0.01), pre-eclampsia (3.6% versus 2.0%, p < 0.01), diabetes (18.8% versus 14.4%, p < 0.01) and caesarean delivery (26.8% versus 19.7%, p < 0.01). Among pregnant women with COVID-19, there was more prematurity between 28 and 31 weeks of gestation (1.3% versus 0.6%, p < 0.01) and between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation (7.7% versus 4.3%, p < 0.01), and more macrosomia (1.0% versus 0.7%, p = 0.04), but there was no difference in small-for-gestational-age newborns (6.3% versus 8.7%, p = 0.15). Logistic regression analysis for prematurity showed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.77 (95% CI 1.55-2.01) for COVID-19. For macrosomia, COVID-19 resulted in non-significant aOR of 1.38 (95% CI 0.95-2.00).

conclusionsCOVID-19 is a risk factor for prematurity, even after adjustment for other risk factors. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The risk of prematurity is twice as high in women with COVID-19 after adjustment for factors usually associated with prematurity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousBirth WeightCohort StudiesFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19hypertensionpre-eclampsiaprematuritySARS-CoV-2small for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID35253329
PMCPMC9111136
OpenAlexW4220934452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.