Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253302›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Understanding volunteer retention in a complex, community-centred intervention: A mixed methods study in Ontario, Canada.

Jessica Gaber, Rebecca E Clark, Larkin Lamarche, Julie Datta, Samina Talat, Sivan Bomze, Sarah Marentette-Brown, Fiona Parascandalo, Stephanie Di Pelino, Doug Oliver and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica GaberDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-2994
Rebecca E ClarkDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Larkin LamarcheDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Julie DattaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Samina TalatCanadian Red Cross, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Sivan BomzeCanadian Red Cross, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah Marentette-BrownCanadian Red Cross, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Fiona ParascandaloDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie Di PelinoDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Doug OliverDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David PriceDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Louise GeoffrionCanadian Red Cross, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Dee ManginDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CACanadian Red Cross Society · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volunteers are critical to supporting health care systems worldwide. For organisations that rely on volunteers, service to clients can be disrupted when volunteers leave their roles. Volunteer retention is a multi-layered phenomenon. In this mixed methods case-control study, we compared two naturally-occurring volunteer groups supporting a complex primary care-based programme for older adults in the community: volunteers retained by the programme, and volunteers that left. Our objectives were to describe differences between the groups and also understand how compassion changed over time for those that stayed. We collected quantitative data on demographics, the UCLA Geriatric Attitudes Scale, the Professional Quality of Life Index, the Basic Empathy Scale, the Reasons for Volunteering subscale of the Volunteerism Questionnaire and the 5-level EQ-5D. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups/interviews. Overall, 78 volunteers completed surveys and 23 participated in focus groups/interviews. Volunteers that stayed were more likely to be a little older and were a slightly higher proportion male than those who left. They also had significantly less positive attitudes towards older adults, descriptively lower Cognitive Empathy and descriptively higher Secondary Traumatic Stress. Compared to volunteers who left, volunteers retained were more likely to have said they were volunteering for Enhancement or Social purposes; however, these differences were non-significant. Over time, Compassion Satisfaction decreased with a medium effect size for those that stayed, and Burnout decreased with a small effect size. Volunteers that stayed described more logistical and client-related aspects of the programme were working well. We recommend that volunteer programmes communicate positive programme impacts that could enhance volunteers' development, communicate any client impacts to volunteers to reinforce volunteers' purposes for volunteering (thus reinforcing that their work is meaningful), and ensure logistical aspects of volunteer role work well.

Indexed as

MotivationQuality of LifeAgedCase-Control StudiesHumansMaleOntarioVolunteersburnoutempathymotivationpersonal satisfactionprimary health carevolunteer retentionvolunteers

Identifiers

PMID35253302
PMCPMC10078732
OpenAlexW4221066027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.