Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253237›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022

Management of oral leukoplakia by ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy: A 3-year retrospective study of 48 patients.

Yi-Lin Yao, Yu-Feng Wang, Chen-Xi Li, Lan Wu, Guo-Yao Tang

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Microneedle combined with photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral leukoplakia].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-Lin YaoDepartment of Oral Mucosal Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5831-2072
Yu-Feng WangDepartment of Oral Mucosal Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-1460
Chen-Xi LiDepartment of Oral Mucosal Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-8284
Lan WuDepartment of Oral Mucosal Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-1063
Guo-Yao TangDepartment of Oral Mucosal Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-5613
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to review the results of oral leucoplakia (OL) using ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT) and to further evaluate the risk factors for recurrence and malignant transformation. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-eight patients diagnosed with OL using histopathology were enrolled in this study. All patients received one session of AFL-PDT. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated 1 month posttreatment. Follow-up was scheduled every 3 months in the first year and every 6 months thereafter.

resultsAn overall positive response rate of 87.5% (42/48) was achieved, including 62.5% (30/48) complete responses and 25.0% (12/48) partial responses. During the 3-year follow-up period, the recurrence and malignant transformation rates were 37.5% (18/48) and 8.3% (4/48), respectively. Lesions on gingiva/palate seemed to be associated with recurrence (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-2.37). The severity of epithelial dysplasia (p = 0.02; OR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.96-4.42) and recurrence (p = 0.016; OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.04-4.84) were associated with a predisposition to malignant transformation.

conclusionsAFL-PDT is an effective management of OL, but requires close follow-up. OL lesions on the gingiva/palate are predisposed to recurrence. OLs that recur with moderate/severe epithelial dysplasia have a higher risk of transforming into oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLasers, Solid-StateMouth NeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyHumansLeukoplakia, OralPhotosensitizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePhotosensitizing Agentsablative fractional lasermalignant transformationoral leukoplakiaphotodynamic therapyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35253237
PMCPMC9314786
OpenAlexW4220760345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.