Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253107›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2022

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations of Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (An ASAP ECMO Study).

Vesa Cheng, Mohd H Abdul-Aziz, Fay Burrows, Hergen Buscher, Young-Jae Cho, Amanda Corley, Eileen Gilder, Hyung-Sook Kim, Sung Yoon Lim, Shay McGuinness and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Vesa ChengUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mohd H Abdul-AzizUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Fay BurrowsDepartment of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hergen BuscherDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Young-Jae ChoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Amanda CorleyAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Eileen GilderCardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hyung-Sook KimDepartment of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yoon LimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Shay McGuinnessCardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rachael ParkeCardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Claire ReynoldsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sam RudhamDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Steven C WallisUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Susan A WelchDepartment of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John F FraserAdult Intensive Care Services and Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kiran ShekarAdult Intensive Care Services and Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-435X
ASAP ECMO Investigators
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe University of Queensland · AUSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRAuckland City Hospital · NZBond University · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the surge in use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the adult intensive care unit, little guidance is available on the appropriate dosing of antimicrobials in this setting. Ceftriaxone is an antimicrobial with a high affinity to plasma protein, a property identified in the literature as susceptible to sequestration into extracorporeal circuits and hypothesised to require dosage adjustments in this setting.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and identify the best dosing regimen for critically ill adult patients receiving ECMO.

methodsSerial blood samples were taken from patients receiving both ECMO and ceftriaxone. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured in plasma by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population pharmacokinetic approach with Pmetrics

resultsIn total, 14 patients were enrolled, of which three were receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT). Total and unbound ceftriaxone was best described in a two-compartment model with total body weight, serum albumin concentrations, creatinine clearance (CrCL), and the presence of RRT included as significant predictors of pharmacokinetics. Patients not on RRT generated a mean renal clearance of 0.90 L/h, non-renal clearance of 0.33 L/h, and central volume of distribution of 7.94 L. Patients on RRT exhibited a mean total clearance of 1.18 L/h. ECMO variables were not significant predictors of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics. Steady-state dosing simulations found that dosages of 1 g every 12 h and 2 g every 24 h achieved >90% probabilities of target attainment in patients with CrCL of 0 mL/min with RRT and 30 and 100 mL/min and various serum albumin concentrations (17 and 26 g/L).

conclusionsDosing recommendations for critically ill adult patients not on ECMO appear to be sufficient for patients on ECMO. Patients exhibiting augmented renal clearance (> 130 mL/min) or treatment of less susceptible pathogens may require higher doses, which requires further investigation.

Indexed as

CeftriaxoneExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSerum AlbuminAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID35253107
PMCPMC9249724
OpenAlexW4221021111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.