Observational studyEmergency radiology2022
Covid Visual Assessment Scale ("Co.V.A.Sc."): quantification of COVID-19 disease extent on admission chest computed tomography (CT) in the prediction of clinical outcome-a retrospective analysis of 273 patients.
Observational study in Emergency radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Lung Sequelae in Survivors of Severe/Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia: The "Non-Steroid", "Non-Interventional" Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The risk profile of patients with COVID-19 as predictors of lung lesions severity and mortality-Development and validation of a prediction model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdmission chest CT is often included in COVID-19 patient management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variability of the Covid Visual Assessment Scale ("Co.V.A.Sc.") used for stratifying chest CT disease extent and to estimate its prospect to predict clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 adult patients undergoing admission chest CT, between 01/03/2021 and 17/03/2021. CTs were independently evaluated by two radiologists according to the "Co.V.A.Sc." (0: 0%, 1: 1-10%, 2: 11-25%, 3: 26-50%, 4: 51-75%, 5: > 75%). Patient demographics, laboratory, clinical, and hospitalization data were retrieved and analyzed in relation to the "Co.V.A.Sc." EVALUATIONS:
resultsOverall, 273 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 14.8 years; 50.9% male) were evaluated. Excellent inter- and intraobserver variability was noted between the two independent radiologists' "Co.V.A.Sc." EVALUATIONS: "Co.V.A.Sc." classification (Exp(B) 0.391, 95%CI 0.212-0.719; p = 0.025) and patient age (Exp(B) 0.947, 95%CI 0.902-0.993; p = 0.25) were the only variables correlated with ICU admission, while age (Exp(B) 1.111, p = 0.0001), "Co.V.A.Sc." (Exp(B) 2.408; p = 0.002), and male gender (Exp(B) 3.213; p = 0.028) were correlated with in-hospital mortality. Specifically, for each "Co.V.A.Sc." unit increase, the probability of ICU admission increased by 1.47 times, and the probability of death increased by 11.1 times. According to ROC analysis, "Co.V.A.Sc." could predict ICU admission and in-hospital death with an optimal cutoff value of unit 3 (sensitivity 56.0%, specificity 84.3%) and unit 4 (sensitivity 41.9%, specificity 93.6%), respectively.
conclusion"Co.V.A.Sc." upon hospital admittance seems to predict ICU admission and in-hospital death and could aid in optimizing risk-stratification and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.