ArticleProceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data2020
Leveraging Differential Privacy in Geospatial Analyses of Standardized Healthcare Data.
Article in Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Evolution and Influence of Medical Open Databases on Biomedical Research and Health Care Innovation: A 25-Year Perspective With a Focus on Privacy and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Geospatial Imprecision With Constraints for Precision Public Health: Algorithm Development and Validation.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024Article
- Geographic Information Systems as Data Sharing Infrastructure for Clinical Data Warehouses.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2023Article
- Substance use disorders and social determinants of health from electronic medical records obtained during Kentucky's "triple wave".Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
We present a collection of geodatabase functions which expedite utilizing differential privacy for privacy-aware geospatial analysis of healthcare data. The healthcare domain has a long history of standardization and research communities have developed open-source common data models to support the larger goals of interoperability, reproducibility, and data sharing; these models also standardize geospatial patient data. However, patient privacy laws and institutional regulations complicate geospatial analyses and dissemination of research findings due to protective restrictions in how data and results are shared. This results in infrastructures with great abilities to organize and store healthcare data, yet which lack the innate ability to produce shareable results that preserve privacy and conform to regulatory requirements. Differential privacy is a model for performing privacy-preserving analytics. We detail our process and findings in inserting an open-source library for differential privacy into a workflow for leveraging a geodatabase for geocoding and analyzing geospatial data stored as part of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model. We pilot this process using an open big data repository of addresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.