Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35253000›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2022

Complexities of Regioselective Ring-Opening vs Transcarbonylation-Driven Structural Metamorphosis during Organocatalytic Polymerizations of Five-Membered Cyclic Carbonate Glucose Monomers.

Yidan Shen, Xin Yang, Yue Song, David K Tran, Hai Wang, Jaye Wilson, Mei Dong, Mariela Vazquez, Guorong Sun, Karen L Wooley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yidan ShenDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-7530
Xin YangDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7859
Yue SongDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-5528
David K TranDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-166X
Hai WangDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-2613
Jaye WilsonDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.
Mei DongDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-0296
Mariela VazquezDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.
Guorong SunDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.
Karen L WooleyDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4086-384X
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigorous investigations of the organobase-catalyzed ring-opening polymerizations (ROPs) of a series of five-membered cyclic carbonate monomers derived from glucose revealed that competing transcarbonylation reactions scrambled the regiochemistries of the polycarbonate backbones. Regioirregular poly(2,3-α-d-glucose carbonate) backbone connectivities were afforded by 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD)-catalyzed ROPs of three monomers having different cyclic acetal protecting groups through the 4- and 6-positions. Small molecule studies conducted upon isolated unimers and dimers indicated a preference for Cx-O2 vs Cx-O3 bond cleavage from tetrahedral intermediates along the pathways of addition-elimination mechanisms when the reactions were performed at room temperature. Furthermore, treatment of isolated 3-unimer or 2-unimer, having the carbonate linkage in the 3- or 2-position as obtained from either Cx-O2 or Cx-O3 bond cleavage, respectively, gave the same 74:26 (3-unimer:2-unimer) ratio, confirming the occurrence of transcarbonylation reactions with a preference for 3-unimer vs. 2-unimer formation in the presence of organobase catalyst at room temperature. In contrast, unimer preparation at -78 °C favored Cx-O3 bond cleavage to afford a majority of 2-unimer, presumably due to a lack of transcarbonylation side reactions. Computational studies supported the experimental findings, enhancing fundamental understanding of the regiochemistry resulting from the ring-opening and subsequent transcarbonylation reactions during ROP of glucose carbonates. These findings are expected to guide the development of advanced carbohydrate-derived polymer materials by an initial monomer design via side chain acetal protecting groups, with the ability to evolve the properties further through later-stage structural metamorphosis.

Identifiers

PMID35253000
PMCPMC8889557
OpenAlexW4210379294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.