Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252982›Full record

ReviewJACS Au2022

Exemplar Mixtures for Studying Complex Mixture Effects in Practical Chemical Separations.

David S Sholl, Ryan P Lively

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACS Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Amines on MIL-101(Cr) for Simultaneous HEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Does Mixed Linker-Induced Surface Heterogeneity Impact the Accuracy of IAST Predictions in UiO-66-NHThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Direct Air Capture of COACS environmental Au · 2023
    Article
  9. Cation Adsorption in TiOACS applied nano materials · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David S ShollSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2771-9168
Ryan P LivelySchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-4008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials and processes for chemical separations must be used in complex environments to have an impact in many practical settings. Despite these complexities, much research on chemical separations has focused on idealized chemical mixtures. In this paper, we suggest that research communities for specific chemical separations should develop well-defined exemplar mixtures to bridge the gap between fundamental studies and practical applications and we provide a hierarchical framework of chemical mixtures for this purpose. We illustrate this hierarchy with examples, including CO

Identifiers

PMID35252982
PMCPMC8889604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.