ArticleJSES international2022
Normalized hand-behind-back for the measurement of shoulder internal rotation.
Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Article
- Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements for Select Shoulder and Forearm Motions.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Acute Effects of Handheld Vibration Massage on Posterior Shoulder Soft Tissues.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe hand-behind-back (HBB) is a method for measuring the range of shoulder internal rotation; here, the highest vertebral level reached by the thumb is recorded. Alternatively, other specific landmarks may be used to measure its distance with the thumb. When the records of distance are adopted, it becomes difficult to compare individuals of different physiques, that is, comparing adults and children. In this study, we proposed a modified HBB method that attempts to normalize body size disparity and examined its reliability.
methodsThree raters measured the modified HBB in 60 healthy subjects. A test-retest design was used, wherein each rater measured one trial, for a total of three trials each subject. The subject's thumb was actively and passively ascended along the spinal column as high as possible; subsequently, the distance between the C7 spinous process and tip of the thumb (C7-thumb) was measured with a tape. The HBB ratio (HBBR) was used as the parameter of shoulder internal rotation. It was defined as the ratio between the C7-thumb and the distance between the C7 spinous process and midpoint of the line connecting the posterior superior iliac spines (C7-posterior superior iliac spine).
resultsIntraclass correlation coefficients (model 2.1) ranged from 0.73 to 0.89, indicating that the reliability of the active and passive HBBR had moderate or good and good reliability, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the values of minimal detectable changes were 0.053 and 0.036 for the active and passive measurements, respectively.
conclusionThe proposed method was confirmed to have sufficient reliability for clinical use. The HBBR may be used as a parameter of the shoulder internal rotation, which enables the comparison between individuals of different physiques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.