ArticleJSES international2022
Metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and primary osteoarthritis.
Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Periprosthetic glenoid and acromial fractures after primary shoulder arthroplasty : Diagnosis, treatment, and revision strategies].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Clinical and radiological comparison of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for patients with primary osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Using deep learning to predict postoperative pain in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients.JSES international · 2025Article
- Clinical and radiological results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with or without lateralization as revision procedure for failed arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Article
- Lateralization has minimal biomechanical impact on tuberosity fixation with the use of a stem-based repair and a 135° humeral implant in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 4-part proximal humerus fracture.JSES international · 2025Article
- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Baseplate Stability Is Affected by Bone Density and the Type and Amount of Augmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs.JSES international · 2024Article
- Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Metallic Lateralized-Offset Glenoid Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.JBJS essential surgical techniquesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants have been developed to prevent common problems that can emerge using Grammont's concept (ie, medialization of center of rotation, decreased humeral offset, scapular notching) in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and primary osteoarthritis (OA).
methodsIn this prospective study, patients with CTA or OA who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using augmented base plates for glenoid lateralization and a "curved stem" design for the humeral side were included. The Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were documented at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Radiographs were reviewed for scapular notching, instability, loosening, osteolysis, ossification, bone resorption, or fractures. Lateralization and distalization shoulder angles were evaluated at the final follow-up.
resultsThere were 23 patients with CTA and 19 patients with OA (27 women; mean age, 76 years; range, 59-85) available for examination at 2 years. Both groups increased significantly in all outcome measures compared with baseline (
conclusionMetallic humeral and glenoid lateralization achieves excellent clinical results in terms of shoulder function, pain relief, muscle strength, and patient-reported subjective assessment without instability or radiographic signs of scapular notching. Patients with primary OA showed an overall trend toward better clinical improvement than patients with CTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.