Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252905›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2022

A systematic review and narrative synthesis of antenatal interventions to improve maternal and neonatal health in Nepal.

Miriam Toolan, Katie Barnard, Mary Lynch, Nashna Maharjan, Meena Thapa, Nisha Rai, Tina Lavender, Michael Larkin, Deborah M Caldwell, Christy Burden and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431581 (Effect of a Mobile Health Intervention on Birth Outcomes in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431581 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Mobile Health Intervention on Birth Outcomes in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorKathmandu University School of Medical SciencesRan2024 to 2027Enrolled494ConditionsBirth OutcomesArmsmHealth intervention (educational video, SMS and reminder phone call)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) in Healthcare-A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Health SWAps in Nepal and Bangladesh.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam ToolanAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Toolan, Mses Barnard and Lynch, and Drs Burden and Merriel).
Katie BarnardAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Toolan, Mses Barnard and Lynch, and Drs Burden and Merriel).
Mary LynchAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Toolan, Mses Barnard and Lynch, and Drs Burden and Merriel).
Nashna MaharjanMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Department of Clinical Science Kathmandu, Nepal (Ms Maharjan and Dr Manandhar).
Meena ThapaKathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal (Dr Thapa).
Nisha RaiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hetauda Hospital, Hetauda, Nepal (Dr Rai).
Tina LavenderLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom (Prof Lavender).
Michael LarkinDepartment of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Dr Larkin).
Deborah M CaldwellPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Caldwell).
Christy BurdenAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Toolan, Mses Barnard and Lynch, and Drs Burden and Merriel).
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Department of Clinical Science Kathmandu, Nepal (Ms Maharjan and Dr Manandhar).
Abi MerrielAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (Dr Toolan, Mses Barnard and Lynch, and Drs Burden and Merriel).
At Bristol · GBMother and Infant Research Activities · NPNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBAston University · GBKathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital · NPLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and neonatal mortality rates remain high in many economically underdeveloped countries, including Nepal, and good quality antenatal care can reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, identifying how to best improve antenatal care can be challenging.

objectiveTo identify the interventions that have been investigated in the antenatal period in Nepal for maternal or neonatal benefit. We wanted to understand their scale, location, cost, and effectiveness. STUDY

designOnline bibliographic databases (Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, British Nursing Index, PsycInfo, Allied and Complementary Medicine) and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched from their inception till May 24, 2020. We included all studies reporting any maternal or neonatal outcome after an intervention in the antenatal period. We screened the studies and extracted the data in duplicate. A meta-analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and outcomes, so we performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies.

resultsA total of 25 studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies showed a variety of approaches toward improving antenatal care (eg, educational programs, incentive schemes, micronutrient supplementation) in different settings (home, community, or hospital-based) and with a wide variety of outcomes. Less than a quarter of the studies were randomized controlled trials, and many were single-site or reported only short-term outcomes. All studies reported having made a positive impact on antenatal care in some way, but only 3 provided a cost-benefit analysis to support implementation. None of these studies focused on the most remote communities in Nepal.

conclusionOur systematic review found good quality evidence that micronutrient supplementation and educational interventions can bring important clinical benefits. Iron and folic acid supplementation significantly reduces neonatal mortality and maternal anemia, whereas birth preparedness classes increase the uptake of antenatal and postnatal care, compliance with micronutrient supplementation, and awareness of the danger signs in pregnancy.

Indexed as

antenatal careantenatal educationbirth preparednesscash incentivefemale community health volunteersglobal healthmaternal mortalitymaternity incentivemicronutrientsneonatal mortalityparticipatory learningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35252905
PMCPMC8883503
OpenAlexW3196975213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.