Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252878›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2021

Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging.

Karen M Hampson, Raphaël Turcotte, Donald T Miller, Kazuhiro Kurokawa, Jared R Males, Na Ji, Martin J Booth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
39.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Polarization-engineered aberration-resilient light sheet microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen M HampsonDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9146-9135
Raphaël TurcotteDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-4190
Donald T MillerSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4395-6216
Kazuhiro KurokawaSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0494-0537
Jared R MalesSteward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2346-3441
Na JiDepartment of Physics, Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-1663
Martin J BoothDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-8981
University of Oxford · GBIndiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Validating Theoretical Models with Neurophysiology and OptogeneticsU19NS107613 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, KENNETH D, SCANZIANI, MASSIMO · 2018 to 2022
$16.7M
Optical Imaging of the Photoreceptor-RPE ComplexR01EY018339 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, DONALD T · 2007 to 2025
$7.7M
High-Speed Volumetric Imaging of Neural Activity throughout the Living Brain - Supplement RequestU01NS103489 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JI, NA · 2017 to 2019
$2.7M
Adaptive optical microscopy for high-accuracy recording of neural activity in vivoU01NS118300 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JI, NA · 2021 to 2023
$1.7M
Imaging spatial and temporal dynamics of retinal ganglion cellsR01EY029808 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, DONALD T · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018339NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029808NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS103489NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS118300NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive optics (AO) is a technique that corrects for optical aberrations. It was originally proposed to correct for the blurring effect of atmospheric turbulence on images in ground-based telescopes and was instrumental in the work that resulted in the Nobel prize-winning discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy. When AO is used to correct for the eye's imperfect optics, retinal changes at the cellular level can be detected, allowing us to study the operation of the visual system and to assess ocular health in the microscopic domain. By correcting for sample-induced blur in microscopy, AO has pushed the boundaries of imaging in thick tissue specimens, such as when observing neuronal processes in the brain. In this primer, we focus on the application of AO for high-resolution imaging in astronomy, vision science and microscopy. We begin with an overview of the general principles of AO and its main components, which include methods to measure the aberrations, devices for aberration correction, and how these components are linked in operation. We present results and applications from each field along with reproducibility considerations and limitations. Finally, we discuss future directions.

Identifiers

PMID35252878
PMCPMC8892592
OpenAlexW3205465672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.