Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252858›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2022

Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data.

Richard S Metcalfe, Sean Williams, Gwen S Fernandes, Todd A Astorino, Matthew J Stork, Shaun M Phillips, Ailsa Niven, Niels B J Vollaard

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Supramaximal high-intensity interval training for older adults in a community setting: a pragmatic feasibility study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard S MetcalfeApplied Sports Science, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Sean WilliamsDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Gwen S FernandesPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Todd A AstorinoDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, United States.
Matthew J StorkSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Shaun M PhillipsHuman Performance Science Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ailsa NivenPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Niels B J VollaardFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBCalifornia State University, San Marcos · USSwansea University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responses to sprint interval exercise (SIE) are hypothesized to be perceived as unpleasant, but SIE protocols are diverse, and moderating effects of various SIE protocol parameters on affective responses are unknown. We performed a systematic search to identify studies (up to 01/05/2021) measuring affective valence using the Feeling Scale during acute SIE in healthy adults. Thirteen studies involving 18 unique trials and 316 unique participant (142 women and 174 men) affective responses to SIE were eligible for inclusion. We received individual participant data for all participants from all studies. All available end-of-sprint affect scores from each trial were combined in a linear mixed model with sprint duration, mode, intensity, recovery duration, familiarization and baseline affect included as covariates. Affective valence decreased significantly and proportionally with each additional sprint repetition, but this effect was modified by sprint duration: affect decreased more during 30 s (0.84 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.74-0.93) and 15-20 s sprints (1.02 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.93-1.10) compared with 5-6 s sprints (0.20 units/sprint; 95% CI: 0.18-0.22) (both SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/sbyn3.

Indexed as

affective valenceFeeling Scalemeta-analysisreduced-exertion high-intensity interval trainingREHITSITsprint interval trainingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35252858
PMCPMC8891702
OpenAlexW4213165786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.