Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252762›Full record

ArticleQuantum machine intelligence2022

Quantum transfer learning for breast cancer detection.

Vanda Azevedo, Carla Silva, Inês Dutra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantum machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Oncological Applications of Quantum Machine Learning.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanda AzevedoDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Carla SilvaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Inês DutraCINTESIS and Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-7769
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the areas with the potential to be explored in quantum computing (QC) is machine learning (ML), giving rise to quantum machine learning (QML). In an era when there is so much data, ML may benefit from either speed, complexity or smaller amounts of storage. In this work, we explore a quantum approach to a machine learning problem. Based on the work of Mari et al., we train a set of hybrid classical-quantum neural networks using transfer learning (TL). Our task was to solve the problem of classifying full-image mammograms into malignant and benign, provided by BCDR. Throughout the course of our work, heatmaps were used to highlight the parts of the mammograms that were being targeted by the networks while evaluating different performance metrics. Our work shows that this method may hold benefits regarding the generalization of complex data; however, further tests are needed. We also show that, depending on the task, some architectures perform better than others. Nonetheless, our results were superior to those reported in the state-of-the-art (accuracy of 84% against 76.9%, respectively). In addition, experiments were conducted in a real quantum device, and results were compared with the classical and simulator.

Indexed as

ApplicationsBreast cancerQuantum machine learningQuantum neural networksTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35252762
PMCPMC8883238
OpenAlexW3156478900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.