Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252587›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2021

Mapping global research on climate and health using machine learning (a systematic evidence map).

Lea Berrang-Ford, Anne J Sietsma, Max Callaghan, Ja C Minx, Pauline Scheelbeek, Neal R Haddaway, Andy Haines, Kristine Belesova, Alan D Dangour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lea Berrang-FordPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-8035
Anne J SietsmaPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-152X
Max CallaghanPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8292-8758
Ja C MinxPriestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2862-0178
Pauline ScheelbeekCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-2284
Neal R HaddawayMercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12-15, EUREF Campus #19, Berlin, 10829, Germany.
Andy HainesCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-4605
Kristine BelesovaCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-5041
Alan D DangourCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-1273
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Johannesburg · ZA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is already affecting health in populations around the world, threatening to undermine the past 50 years of global gains in public health. Health is not only affected by climate change via many causal pathways, but also by the emissions that drive climate change and their co-pollutants. Yet there has been relatively limited synthesis of key insights and trends at a global scale across fragmented disciplines. Compounding this, an exponentially increasing literature means that conventional evidence synthesis methods are no longer sufficient or feasible. Here, we outline a protocol using machine learning approaches to systematically synthesize global evidence on the relationship between climate change, climate variability, and weather (CCVW) and human health. We will use supervised machine learning to screen over 300,000 scientific articles, combining terms related to CCVW and human health. Our inclusion criteria comprise articles published between 2013 and 2020 that focus on empirical assessment of: CCVW impacts on human health or health-related outcomes or health systems; relate to the health impacts of mitigation strategies; or focus on adaptation strategies to the health impacts of climate change. We will use supervised machine learning (topic modeling) to categorize included articles as relevant to impacts, mitigation, and/or adaptation, and extract geographical location of studies. Unsupervised machine learning using topic modeling will be used to identify and map key topics in the literature on climate and health, with outputs including evidence heat maps, geographic maps, and narrative synthesis of trends in climate-health publishing. To our knowledge, this will represent the first comprehensive, semi-automated, systematic evidence synthesis of the scientific literature on climate and health.

Indexed as

adaptationClimateglobalhealthmachine learningmitigationsystematictopic modelling

Identifiers

PMID35252587
PMCPMC8889042
OpenAlexW3123565732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.