Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252564›Full record

ArticleSurgery journal (New York, N.Y.)2022

Stentolith in Bile Duct: A Neglected Entity-Case Report with Review of Literature.

Amit Gupta, Deepak Rajput, Jaine John Chennat, Tanuj Singla, Shaik Sameer Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Giant pancreatic stentolith after chronic transgastric pancreatic duct drainage.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit GuptaDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-4120
Deepak RajputDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Jaine John ChennatDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Tanuj SinglaDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Shaik Sameer AhmedDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stentolith is a forgotten stent that acts as a nidus for stone formation leading to a stone-stent complex. Once the planned procedure is completed, these stents should be removed within 4 to 6 weeks, but if they are required for a longer period, then they should be replaced every 3 to 6 months. Devastating complications may ensue -such as cholangitis, biliary stricture, or secondary biliary cirrhosis. Management primarily comprises surgical intervention with common bile duct exploration or endoscopic clearance. The majority of patients eventually develop symptoms that lead to their diagnosis and subsequent management. This article, however, details the case of a silent stentolith and how it may have led to disastrous complications if surgical intervention was not done promptly.

Indexed as

cholangiographycholelithiasisstentingstentolith

Identifiers

PMID35252564
PMCPMC8894087
OpenAlexW4214806282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.