Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252546›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2022

Digestibility and palatability of Virginia fanpetals (

Cezary Purwin, Marta Borsuk-Stanulewicz, Zenon Nogalski, Maja Baranowska, Aleksandra Zygmuntowicz, Jacek P Michalski

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cezary PurwinDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Marta Borsuk-StanulewiczDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Zenon NogalskiDepartment of Cattle Breeding and Milk Evaluation, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Maja BaranowskaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Aleksandra ZygmuntowiczDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-719, Poland.
Jacek P MichalskiKielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna, 05-110, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to evaluate Virginia fanpetals silage based on an apparent digestibility and palatability test performed on six adult rams. Alfalfa silage was used as standard forage for comparison. Virginia fanpetals samples were harvested in the bud-formation stage and alfalfa samples were harvested in the late bud stage. Virginia fanpetals silage had a crude protein (CP) content of 176 g kg

Identifiers

PMID35252546
PMCPMC8892564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.