Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252481›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2021

The hierarchical construction of value.

John P O'Doherty, Ueli Rutishauser, Kiyohito Iigaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prefrontal Mechanisms of Rule Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Is the Whole the Sum of its Parts? Neural Computation of Consumer Bundle Valuation in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. eLife · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The online metacognitive control of decisions.Communications psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Semantic knowledge of social interactions is mediated by the hedonic evaluation system in the brain.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A clearing in the objectivity of aesthetics?Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  11. Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Neural Representations of Food-Related Attributes in the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex during Choice Deliberation in Anorexia Nervosa.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Reinforcement-learning in fronto-striatal circuits.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John P O'DohertyDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Ueli RutishauserDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
Kiyohito IigayaDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADOLPHS, RALPH · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Neuronal Substrates of Hemodynamic Signals in the Prefrontal CortexR01MH111425 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A., O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Determining the explanatory utility of computational reinforcement-learning theories of goal-directed and habitual control at behavioral and neural levelsR01MH121089 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Determining the neural substrates of model-based and model-free reinforcement-learning during Pavlovian conditioning (Minority Supplement)R01DA040011 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
Toward a High Dimensional Computational Description of Variation in Human Decision-Making Across Psychiatric and Non-Psychiatric PopulationsR21MH120805 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2019 to 2020
$464k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040011NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111425NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121089NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we argue that the assignment of subjective value to potential outcomes at the time of decision-making is an active process, in which individual features of a potential outcome of varying degrees of abstraction are represented hierarchically and integrated in a weighted fashion to produce an overall value judgment. We implicate the lateral orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in this function, situating these areas more broadly within a hierarchical integration process that takes place throughout the cortex for the ultimate purpose of valuing options to guide decisions.

Indexed as

decision-makingHierarchical structureOutcomesvalue

Identifiers

PMID35252481
PMCPMC8896512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.