Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252367›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Artificial Intelligence-A Good Assistant to Multi-Modality Imaging in Managing Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Ming-Hao Liu, Chen Zhao, Shengfang Wang, Haibo Jia, Bo Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Hao LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chen ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shengfang WangDepartment of Cardiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Haibo JiaDepartment of Cardiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bo YuDepartment of Cardiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome is the leading cause of cardiac death and has a significant impact on patient prognosis. Early identification and proper management are key to ensuring better outcomes and have improved significantly with the development of various cardiovascular imaging modalities. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence as a method of enhancing the capability of cardiovascular imaging has grown. AI can inform the decision-making process, as it enables existing modalities to perform more efficiently and make more accurate diagnoses. This review demonstrates recent applications of AI in cardiovascular imaging to facilitate better patient care.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeartificial intelligencecomputed tomographycoronary angiographyintravascular ultrasoundmachine learningmagnetic resonanceoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID35252367
PMCPMC8888682
OpenAlexW4213013917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.