ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021
An Augmented Multiple Imputation Particle Filter for River State Estimation With Missing Observation.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, a new form of data assimilation (DA) method namely multiple imputation particle filter with smooth variable structure filter (MIPF-SVSF) is proposed for river state estimation. This method is introduced to perform estimation during missing observation by presenting new sets of data. The contribution of this work is to overcome the missing observation, and at the same time improve the estimation performance. The convergence analysis of the MIPF-SVF is discussed and shows that the method depends on the number of particles and imputations. However, the number of particles and imputations is influenced by the error difference in the likelihood function. By bounding the error, the ability of the method can be improved and the number of particles and computational time are reduced. The comparison between the proposed method with EKF during complete data and multiple imputation particle filter shows the effectiveness of the MIPF-SVSF. The percentage improvement of the proposed method compared to MIPF in terms of root mean square error is between 12 and 13.5%, standard deviation is between 14 and 15%, mean absolute error is between 2 and 7%, and the computational error is reduced between 73 and 90% of the length of time required to perform the estimation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.